• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    16 days ago

    Cheap #bothSides nonsense.

    You mean

    GqP: lol no plebe

    Dems: if we can get the ability, that’s our goal. Aw fuck we’ve been cockblocked by the senate again. Sorry.

    • thundermoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      It doesn’t seem weird to you that there’s always some reason a Democrat prevents Democrats from accomplishing things when they have a majority? It’s been like two decades of this, bud. There’s always some reason for them not to fix anything.

      I’ll vote Democrat every time because, although they barely do anything, at least they won’t actively make things worse. That choice fucking sucks though, so quit acting like Democrats aren’t trash. They are trash and the only reason to vote for them is because the other side is taking policy advice from literal Nazis.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        16 days ago

        I’ll vote Democrat every time because, although they barely do anything, at least they won’t actively make things worse. That choice fucking sucks though, so quit acting like Democrats aren’t trash. They are trash

        Have you considered, y’know, participating in the party? It’s pretty easy to do. Or is it just like, “Feh. Muh. Bleh.” Which I totally understand. Things is complicated.

        • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          Have you considered, y’know, participating in the party?

          Yes, just like the over 100,000 protest votes in Michigan during the primaries to protest the Palestinian genocide.

          The DNC gave Michigan Muslims/Arabs the middle finger and said “We don’t need your votes, and we’re not changing course on Palestine.”

          The DNC threw trans people under the bus literally the day after they lost the election, and continue to tell us that the reason the DNC lost is because they were too woke.

          In 2016, we tried to get Bernie to be our candidate, and Clinton and the DNC did everything in their power to ensure that wouldn’t happen, because the DNC knows best. 🙄

          Same in 2020, they had Bloomberg and Warren siphon votes off Bernie to split the progressive vote and seal the nomination for Centrist-Joe, who had to borrow policies from Bernie’s campaign to be popular enough to beat Trump. And then spent four years not enacting any of those policies.

          Like, I’m so tired of hearing how it’s our fault, the voter’s fault, for the DNC being a shitty party. Hundreds of thousands of people protest voted during this primary, and the DNC ignored their voices, and now you’re condescendingly making a comment about people not being more involved with the party?

          What a load of horse shit. The voters don’t need to engage with the party, the party needs to engage with voters, and since they raised over a billion dollars and spent a majority of it on Clinton’s 2016 political consultants… I’d say they have the resources to get off their fat asses, leave their liberal white porcelain towers, and come fucking talk to their constituents for once and figure out why they don’t represent us.

          Oh, I forgot, because they’re too busy raising campaign money instead of changing campaign finance laws, and they’re too busy rubbing elbows with their colleagues across the aisle instead of getting things done, OH, or they’re on one of their numerous multi-week vacations at one of their second/third/fourth residential homes while their constituents are guaranteed no vacation time period. God, it must be so hard relating to a populace you literally share nothing in common with, why won’t the filthy poors just realize they’re inferior to these liberal elite who know best for them.

          Or are we supposed to go participate as a PAC, should we all just be billionaires, since they’re the only ones the DNC will listen to?

          “Participate,” what a joke.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            16 days ago

            “Participate,” what a joke.

            I was actually asking the other guy. But uh, nice, uh . . rant.

            • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              16 days ago

              I was actually asking the other guy.

              Cool story, but I was talking to you.

              But uh, nice, uh . . rant.

              Says the troll out for his daily round of trolling, the legitimate only thing the sad troll can contribute to their sad, trolling existence.

                • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Still waiting for you to enlighten all of us about how to properly participate with the DNC, troll?

                  We’re waiting, c’mon Troll Genius, all of us morons need you to enlighten us, how do we participate with the DNC?

                  Well?

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          If you don’t like things as they are, just singlehandedly change the party! Now the party is still shit like I want, but it’s your fault!

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      Then weren’t. They had a trifecta for 2 years and it became obvious that they were unwilling to actually fight. They gave up at literally the first sign of resistance. And they haven’t put forward anything that would actually change the system. Just a pay raise.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        16 days ago

        Then weren’t. They had a trifecta for 2 years and it became obvious that they were unwilling to actually fight.

        You mean the term where the Dems passed the largest healthcare in 40 years with the passing of the ACA (Obamacare)? How is that not an achievement?

        • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          It was literally mitt Romneys Healthcare plan from Massachusetts. They didn’t even get a public option. It was the bare minimum because dems didnt want to mess with the insurance companies that line there pockets.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            16 days ago

            It was literally mitt Romneys Healthcare plan from Massachusetts.

            I don’t care who gets the credit for the original model. Most Americans had FAR less healthcare options before the ACA.

            They didn’t even get a public option. It was the bare minimum because dems didnt want to mess with the insurance companies that line there pockets.

            You’re complaining about how it could be better. Do you not remember what life was like BEFORE the ACA?

            • Being denied for a preexisting condition?
            • Basic wellness care like mammograms not covered?
            • Swiss cheese independent coverage chocked full of “gotcha” exclusions?

            Could it be better? Sure. Was it so much better than the NOTHING we had before? Absolutely!

            • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              16 days ago

              bud, that was 16 years ago and the situation has only worsened. maybe its time to stop trotting it out as some grand thing the democrats did and focus on what they’re doing today? which is essentially nothing.

              • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                15 days ago

                and focus on what they’re doing today?

                You mean like the recovery of the country from COVID with the American Rescue Plan Act, or Inflation Reduction Act, the CHIPs act, Student loan forgiveness? How about repeal of the homophobic “Defense of Marriage Act”? Maybe the Honoring our PACT Act which finally recognized the conditions we put our troops in and covering their health needs resulting from that exposure? Those kind of things?

                • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  15 days ago

                  Wow! and americans day to day finances havent improved at all! Imagine doing all that and still having people struggling… I wonder…

                  Lets go down the list shall we?

                  CHIPs act: surprise a bipartisan corporate give away.
                  American Rescue Plan Act: corporate give away mixed with one time stimulus for americans.
                  Inflation Reduction Act: I actually liked this bill mostly too bad it does nothing for the majority of americans w/ respect to inflation and cost of living.
                  Student loan forgiveness: oh you mean the thing biden has slow walked, only managing to clear 9% in 4 years, and is the direct architect of causing? oh you mean the man who also resumed payments for them despite record inflation?
                  Defense of Marriage Act: yup wonderful, good job dems! the only thing that doesn’t negatively impact your corporate donors you got done!
                  Honoring our PACT Act: Oh you mean health care in america is fucking horrible? color me surprised, yet another excuse to not actually fix our health care system.

                  seriously man. think about these things before you post them. I’m not opposed to many of these bills but NONE of them improve the general well being of the american worker or their families.

                  Do people still need to worry about their health coverage if they lose their jobs? Yes? oh.
                  Do people still need to work multiple jobs to make ends meet in many areas? Yes? oh.
                  Do people still have no protections for medical, family, vacation? Yes? oh.
                  Do people still have to go into massive debt for an education? Yes? oh.
                  Do sexual orientations still have no protections within the workplace? yes? oh.

                  Until the democrats begin addressing these issues for working americans they won’t have the support of myself or individuals like me. Don’t even get me fucking started on the widespread genocidal support, moral bankruptcy, and graft within the party.

                  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    15 days ago

                    I’m not opposed to many of these bills but NONE of them improve the general well being of the american worker or their families.

                    You have a very specific definition of any legislative success. You have a very defined view (regardless if I agree with it or not).

                    Can you tell me when the last time any level of legislation was passed by any party that would meet your version of success? The only thing I can think of that would meet your very high bar is FDR with the New Deal and other efforts FDR did with the TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority). Do you have something more recent that 1939?

        • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 days ago

          How is that not an achievement?

          Because the Dems let the GOP gut it to get it to pass. The ACA as it is now, and as it was passed back then, was not what we were promised, and we still haven’t gotten the ACA we were promised.

          In fact, Harris dropped support for M4A and didn’t campaign on it, so is that an achievement too? The Dems giving up the fight before it even started? Like they did during this administration, literally bending over any time the GOP put up any kind of resistance to any of the Dems legislation?

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            The Dems let the Dems gut it. There wasn’t a Republican that supported it. The massive partisan wall that created is a huge reason why things are so fucked now.

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              16 days ago

              The Dems let the Dems gut it.

              I don’t disagree. The original had more stuff in it that I liked.

              There wasn’t a Republican that supported it.

              True. The GOP rejected it for many stupid reasons.

              The massive partisan wall that created is a huge reason why things are so fucked now.

              This statement confuses me. Are you suggesting the Dems should have let the GOP gut it MORE? Are you suggesting the Dems should have dropped the legislation altogether to “keep the peace”? What are you saying the Dems could have done so “things are so fucked now”?

              • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                16 days ago

                Yes the Dems should have got some gop votes. It may have made the bill slightly worse, but not by much. In return the Democrats would have had far more negotiating power with there own members if there were a couple of the more purple Republicans that they could count on instead. It also would have prevented the bill from being a great campaign piece for Republicans, and it might not have resulted in one of the largest midterm swings ever.

                Getting 95% of the ACA and a Congress that wasn’t deadlocked for the next 6 years would have been much better overall. A split government that functioned more like under Clinton or Bush would have been much better than what ended up happening. The decision to stonewall when they had power unsurprisingly backfired.

                • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  uhhhh, literally the bill was designed and discussed with the GOP they just refused to support it after they basically got it watered down. then there was the ol’ whats his face dem that refused to vote for it without removing the public option.

                • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Yes the Dems should have got some gop votes. It may have made the bill slightly worse, but not by much.

                  …and…

                  Getting 95% of the ACA and a Congress that wasn’t deadlocked for the next 6 years would have been much better overall.

                  The GOP were looking to deny any Obama passage of positive legislation. Are you not remembering “make him a one term President” message from the GOP?

                  There was ZERO amount of cooperate the GOP were willing to have on any bill that would give Obama a healthcare win.

                  A split government that functioned more like under Clinton or Bush would have been much better than what ended up happening. The decision to stonewall when they had power unsurprisingly backfired.

                  “make him a one term President”

                  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    15 days ago

                    There’s always rhetoric, but completely shutting out the opposition for major legislation was just not done.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            16 days ago

            Because the Dems let the GOP gut it to get it to pass. The ACA as it is now, and as it was passed back then, was not what we were promised, and we still haven’t gotten the ACA we were promised.

            Perfect is the enemy of good.

            What Obama signed with the ACA was far better than the situation before it.

            • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              16 days ago

              Right, must be why I don’t have health insurance via the ACA because it’s unaffordable.

              I make too much to qualify for actual help, but not enough to actually afford their awful health insurance plans with deductibles that negate the entire point of insurance to begin with.

              And it’s all about to be undone anyway, so let’s keep singing the praises of the Democrat’s least-failure in the last decade.

              Perfect is the enemy of good.

              Which must be why the DNC has adopted “Progress is the enemy of our money.”

              • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                16 days ago

                Right, must be why I don’t have health insurance via the ACA because it’s unaffordable. I make too much to qualify for actual help, but not enough to actually afford their awful health insurance plans with deductibles that negate the entire point of insurance to begin with.

                Are you possibly living in a state where your GOP leadership refused to extend Medicaid which was part of the ACA? If so, you can’t complain about what the ACA doesn’t do for you if your state chose not to use it.

                • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  I live in a blue state in the Northeast, we went to Harris, and we’ve had a Democratic governor since at least the mid-2000s.

                  So am I allowed to complain?

                  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    15 days ago

                    Did you miss the “if so” in my post?

                    You’re communicating you’re making over $61k/year and saying you can’t afford an ACA approved healthcare policy, correct?

                  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    15 days ago

                    No, this happens in states like MA/Cali too.

                    “Who is eligible for health insurance subsidies?” source

                    Household size

                    • 1 person max income $60,240

                    If thats the case then @BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world is saying they make more than $61k/year and can’t afford $264/month with a $6300 annual deductible?

        • TunaCowboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          16 days ago

          I’m so thankful my premiums doubled, now someone with a preexisting condition can pay $500 a month for a 50k deductible! So much hope and change!

          I don’t think drumpf has killed a citizen without due process yet, but when he does he can thank Obama for paving the way.

          Obama fucking sucked, but he was a charismatic media darling and liberals ate that shit up just like the cons do with drumpf.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            16 days ago

            I’m so thankful my premiums doubled,

            Are you a guy? If so you many not know that men like us were paying FAR LESS for healthcare than women of our exact same age. I learned this when my woman co-worker (same age) and I were comparing pay stubs many years ago (and many years prior to the ACA). As a young 20 year old man I was paying $30/paycheck. She was paying $124/paycheck simply because she was a woman.

            This is one of the things the ACA fixed, and I agree with it. Men pay the same as women under the ACA.

            Another thing that the ACA fixed was “swiss cheese” insurance. Insurance policies were filled with tons of tiny exclusions where you would be paying for premiums for months or years and when you finally needed it for something big, they’d point out fine print and you’d have no coverage. The ACA stopped that and made all insurance plans have a basic level of coverage they couldn’t weasel out of. So you may have been paying cheap premiums before for insurance that would give you the finger when you needed it. The ACA fixed this. You’re paying now for coverage that actually covers what it says.

            now someone with a preexisting condition can pay $500 a month for a 50k deductible! So much hope and change!

            I don’t know how much you know about chronic health problems that were previously called “pre-existing conditions”. $500 a month for a 50k deductible would a godsend for many prior to the ACA. Treatment can cost literally millions of dollars, and if $50k covers that, its amazing.

            You may not have a condition that needs this today, but you may in the future. You’d be thankful you would be covered by the ACA rules.

      • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        16 days ago

        That 60 seat majority included Joe “totally a real Democrat” Manchin and a deceased Ted Kennedy, and they still passed the Affordable Care Act which was very much a “big fucking deal.”

        • Allonzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          The ACA was a national version of the Heritage foundation’s for profit friendly Healthcare bandaid that bent over backward to keep for profit insurer’s cut in and was initially instituted by a Republican governor. It didn’t even put us in the right direction, because the right direction is ending the role of private insurer middlemen in Healthcare, which is yet another national disease we suffer. It insured more people at the cost of expanding the profit base of the market capitalists, the enemies of almost everyone else whether they love that enemy or not.

          The Democrats have never done what needs to be done, take some of the profit from the oligarchs that profit off society and only succeeded with societal infrastructure they don’t want to pay for, and give it to society through the commons.

          Until a party starts addressing the greedy profiteer elephant in the room, nothing can improve, so nothing will improve until this gold plated cesspool collapses, almost certainly by the impacts of capitalist made climate change.

          This system is comically too far captured by the capital market to have any reasonable hope for rehabilitation. It has protections upon protections, both through effective propaganda cannels and then force, to prevent any economic rehabilitation that doesn’t hand even more GDP to the 0.1% at everyone else’s expense.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          16 days ago

          The Affordable Care Act fell far short of being what we really needed, where millions still suffer with unaffordable premiums and worthless coverage. What we need is universal healthcare.

          Joe Manchin wasn’t a god. They could have dealt with him if the political will existed, just like they could have dealt with Joe Lieberman back in 2009. Mobilize the people against him, Go after his financial supporters, go after his friends and family, make his life a living hell for defying the will of the Party and the People.

          But Democrats will never do something like that

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              16 days ago

              That probably wouldn’t work. They’d be outbid.

              But you know what? Raising hell against Republicans is possible too - it’s possible to organize against them no matter which party they’re in. Go after them in their districts, go after their financial backers, go after the special interests that support them, go after the people that vote Republican, friends and family, I don’t fucking care, whatever it takes. Make them suffer our political wrath and they’ll fall in line.

    • PhilipTheBucketA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      If someone’s using it as an argument “Here’s why we need to get involved in political activism and improve the Democratic party,” then it makes perfect sense. Biden did good, but the Democrats are far from what we need.

      If someone’s using it as an argument “Why not just abandon the idea of influencing politics at all, even if that means letting the Republicans have a turn smashing up the country we all live in to sell it as scrap for them and their friends while killing anyone who disagrees, because what’s the worst that could happen, Dems suck anyway lol,” they are either trying to help the Republicans or they’ve been fooled by the people who are trying to help the Republicans. They will, in the next few years, be able to have a terrifying and tragic object lesson in what the worst that could happen is.