• 0 Posts
  • 284 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

  • You are 100% correct, EXCEPT for the emergency cash flow thing is backwards. Let’s say you have $20,000 for a car. If you put that whole $20,000 to buy a car, and an emergency comes up where you need $5,000, it will be much harder to get a loan to pay for that on the same terms as a car loan.

    What you’re describing there to me is an anti-pattern. If you have to spend $20k to buy a car and you blow through your entire emergency fund to do it bringing your emergency fund to $0, you’ve already made a mistake. To use your numbers, if you have $20k and you need a car. You buy a $15k car. You have a fully paid off car, and an extra $5k in the bank for emergencies. Further, I still make a car payment, but to myself, every month that goes into savings to buy the next car outright. Its easy to do because I don’t have a real car payment to a bank. If money is ever tight, I can choose to not make my “car payment” to myself giving me more flexibility, liquidity, and less overall worry. A year after this purchase and even after the $5k emergency, I have $3900 positive in savings from my “car payment to myself” and still have a paid off car.

    On the other hand, if you put $2,000 towards the car and borrow $18,000 at 3% for 5 years, that’s $325 a month, give or take depends on fees. Now you still have $18,000 free for emergencies, and you’re theoretically still making money at your job, so you can keep building that neat egg with interest.

    Continue to play that out with a more likely bad case scenario. You start with $18k in the bank, and you’ve now leveraged your emergency fund to also cover car. You have your theoretical $5k emergency dip into it leaving you with $13k in the bank. A year later, you lose your job. Your car payment is still due, you have the remainder of the real car payments to make at $325/month to the bank. So now you’re drawing down your savings (and the money you would have paid off the car with) just to live on. You can try to sell the car, but its depreciated and you’re not going to get even enough money to pay off the bank note. You took on the worry of this and this risk everyday for five years to try to make about a measly ~$1k profit.

    I’m not saying this is exactly how its going to happen, but in your scenario the possibility exists for this. In my “buy the car outright” it doesn’t. How often in life does everything go perfectly for you? My experience says, not often.


  • Obviously most people aren’t thinking this far ahead, but even if you have the cash, sometimes it actually makes sense to take out a loan.

    Here’s where the “makes sense” becomes subjective. If your definition is absolute most cash value extracted, then yes.

    However there’s a certain mental cost that you don’t escape by having to make sure you don’t get screwed on the initial loan terms, have the cash for the pay the installments, make sure the payments get to the lender, follow up on any customer services issues that occur over the life of the loan, navigate any life events which can restrict or restrain your cash flow being able to make payments (like layoff or illness), possibly liquidate holdings to free up cash to make the payment, keep track of the cash you would have spent on the car in an external account earning the best return you can get (with varying interest rates or market conditions).

    …or you can pay for the car outright one time, and never think about those things again for that car possible for a decade or more. Today’s life is filled with many such mental burdens. The value in being able to simply never have this worry is very underrated in my opinion. This is one component to approach a care-free lifestyle while still maintaining your responsibilities and freedoms.











  • For this discussion, you’re really torturing the definition of a bus if you’re going to use BRT to mean busses. BRT does not meet most peoples definition of “city bus” as the conversation up to now has suggested.

    I’m not saying BRT is better than light or heavy rail, but that should be a more common path for mass transit that is not utilized in the U

    BRT would nearly always be a zero sum solution to make your statement true. You would have to subtract from current roads that accommodate traffic to create BRT to meet your metric. Land, espeically in dense cities is nearly always already allocated. If anything besides the zero sum BRT, light rail would likely be a better choice than BRT because it can subterranean or elevated with fewer building challenges/dangers.

    I’m not saying BRT is better than light or heavy rail, but that should be a more common path for mass transit that is not utilized in the US

    I’m interested in an example of a city you have a in mind that BRT would be a better choice than city busses or light rail.


  • He represents radical change, a concentration of government power in the executive branch. Sweeping changes under the guise of helping “real Americans” and harming the usual scapegoats (immigrants, gangs, socialists).

    While we know Trump is a conman, I would understand this as a rationale for those that didn’t believe he was a conman, except we’ve already HAD 4 years of a Trump Presidency. If he was promising these great reforms for the little guy, why didn’t he do any of them in the 4 years he was in office? Why do people think this time will be different?


  • There also seems to be a stigma against buses, though, where people are more willing to take a train than a bus.

    I’ll absolutely take a train over a bus if they are going to the same destination.

    • train has fewer stops meaning train reaches the destination faster
    • train has ultimate right-of-way, and doesn’t have to stop for pedestrians on the tracks, red lights, or other things
    • trains in some cities, go under waterways meaning more direct routes than busses
    • there’s more space inside trains and usually more choice of seats. Standing is also an option which isn’t allowed on most busses
    • acceleration and deceleration are more predictable and comfortable
    • nearly all metro light rail trains are powered by electricity, while many city busses remain diesel



  • “The allegations included reports of paid FPF petition circulators signing petitions on behalf of deceased individuals, forging or misrepresenting elector signatures of petitions, using electors’ personal identifying information without consent, and perjury/false swearing,” the report claims, noting that “more than 20” of the 911,000 signatures were from now-deceased Floridians.

    If I’m reading this data right more than 730 Floridians die every day of the year, and considering these petitions usually have to be have the signatures collected and filed months before the ballot, even assuming that whole process only took 2 months, that would mean 43,800 Floridians had died in that time. It would actually surprise me if the number of dead signatories to the ballot measure were as low as 20.