Common law, right? Even if the resolution doesn’t have a practical impact now, it’s important to set a precedent (hopefully to prevent such things in the future).
But isn’t the point that it’s pretty clearly illegal already, which is why they’re now framing it as something else?
As long as rich reich-wingers can just throw lawyers at something that looks like vote buying, they can drag things out until elections are over and then it’ll be too late – can’t undo the effect post hoc.
Common law, right? Even if the resolution doesn’t have a practical impact now, it’s important to set a precedent (hopefully to prevent such things in the future).
But isn’t the point that it’s pretty clearly illegal already, which is why they’re now framing it as something else?
As long as rich reich-wingers can just throw lawyers at something that looks like vote buying, they can drag things out until elections are over and then it’ll be too late – can’t undo the effect post hoc.