• knightmare1147@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 months ago

    There was a term I really liked for this kind of things: “Vacationing in poverty” I think, where people with wealth ‘adventure’ being homeless or something but don’t even remotely appreciate that the people they’re pretending to be don’t have an ‘off’ switch or an easy out of their situations.

    I find the whole premise despicable.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      Kinda like that undercover boss show where they tried to show how great these CEOs are by throwing some money at specific employees that are struggling, ignoring that better leadership and compensation that lines up better with the value being created would improve things for all of the other struggling employees that weren’t lucky enough to be assigned to boss babysitting duty (assuming the whole thing wasn’t staged entirely).

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        It probably wasn’t staged sadly. Those privileged billionaires saw the struggling employees as the exception, not the rule.

        I know it wasn’t because there was an episode where an employee disillusioned with life and struggling with drug addiction was fired “As a favor to him”, and it was framed as being super wholesome, even though now that guy without any financial support and no way to get help will likely relapse harder than he ever has…

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            “It gives you the chance to put your life back in order” and other empty platitudes that ignore what’s really happening.

            • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              wat

              I understand that you’re quoting. This is no criticism of your comment. I consider myself fairly adept at imitating the mental gymnastics. But here, I’m at a loss.

              • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                The rich do not think critically about the world around them. They have never had to fight for anything in their lives, all their success is just handed to them. They’ve never had to make hard decisions.

                This means that they have never had to be introspective or give any thought to how their actions affect those around them.

                They are simply disillusioned because their wealth puts a barrier between them and the harshness of life.

                So they do not recognize suffering when they see it, and when they do they blame the victim because they know that this couldn’t happen to them, and that means it doesn’t happen to anybody worthwhile.

      • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would understand a boss going undercover to investigate where things are least efficient and whether their subordinates are lying about safety violations at a lower cost than getting an actual investigation.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          The word “subordinates” disgusts me.
          Luckily I’ve never had to work with someone who felt they were above the other members of their team.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Subordinate has a lot of implications, and typically I only hear it used to talk about people working for the bad guy…

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Especially since they keep doing it to prove that “Oh anyone can be a millionaire, ya just gotta not be lazy.”, and despite each of them failing when they fail to prove this, they still proceed to learn nothing form this.

      If only I could show the world what rich people really think of the common man, but if thousands of films like “Joker” and “V For Vendetta” where that’s the sole point didn’t do it, then what the fuck else will?

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Back in 2016, I didn’t understand how an extremely wealthy heir to a billion-dollar fortune (and regardless of all his business failures) could present himself as the candidate of the little people. Today, after Trump was president and - of course - only made policy changes for the rich, I understand it even less. What is this photo-op all about? Are there seriously still people who don’t understand that Trump has never represented the middle class - or even the working class? You can’t be serious, dear US citizens.

    • DevopsPalmer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s super frustrating but as an example - my parents are deeply conservative and supportive of Trump, and also on the lower end of “wealth” and semi-retired. It is 100% misinformation. My Dad quotes the Fox news rhetoric like it’s facts, and regardless of me disproving most of the BS, he is completely brain washed. At this point Trump could run a live execution of his political opponents and the Trumpets would more or less shrug.

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes. Half the country thinks Trump is for the little guy and Harris is an elitist asshole.

      Trump was born rich. Harris grew up middle class and a member of two minority groups. The problem is the democrats are shit at messaging. It’s why Walz calling republicans weird took off. Democrats don’t usually come up with sound bites like that.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        I sincerely don’t understand how this is even possible. A lot of these people are old, do they not remember the 90’s? Trump being “Smug Rich Asshole: The Character” was his whole brand, and people loved him for it because we were still drinking that “Capitalism good” kool-aid left over from the cold war.

        How is this man with a literal solid gold toilet “The Voice of the People”

        This whole nonsense makes me perfectly understand how “War of the Worlds” was mistaken for a legitimate news broadcast.

          • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m only a chapter in, but found the section on conventionalism curious. It may explain why they take such issue with being called “weird”: If they value their perception of being “normal”, “weird” isn’t just an insult used against people you don’t like, it’s an attack on a principal personality trait.

    • BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Before 2016 he was a celebrity people liked him as a no bullshit business owner like the middle class small business owners. As he was exposed to more media and has proven he was more of an idiot it personified him as someone like them. A moron who does what they want with 0 reflection or cares about other people.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m baffled as to how anyone other than asshole bosses saw him as anything other than another asshole boss. The Apprentice gave me a strong negative opinion of him, similarly to how Shark Tank gave me a strong negative opinion of Kevin O’Leary.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      As someone who went down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole in the 00s but realized Alex Jones was full of shit by 2010, I was incredibly baffled to see the movement align behind someone who could be an avatar of everything it feared.

      That said, the racism and bigotry in that movement had gone right over my head and I generally dismissed the more out there shit like lizard people or aliens being involved because it sounded stupid. I believed (and still do) that that shit is part of a real strategy to use ridiculous claims to generate noise that makes real things like MK ultra more likely to be dismissed along with them.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Went through the same thing, admittedly what got me out of it was realizing how often it came back to “And that’s why Hitler did nothing wrong!”

        Which made me go “That whole “genocide is good actually” thing… doesn’t really align with all this talk of how peace and love are being threatened by the forces of darkness…”

        I figured it was a few bad eggs who just somehow got the wrong message, but it kept happening

        All the people telling me I was on the George Soros payroll was kinda the very last straw, because how could I be the bad guy in this “conspiracy” and being so richly rewarded for it if I was struggling this much? And who the fuck was George Soros? I still to this day barely know who the fuck that even is.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, for me it was Alex Jones presenting this idea that the world elites had a plan to depopulate the world, saying that he had a solution, but then leaving that as a cliffhanger for his next video. I was left thinking, “wait, this seems more urgent than ‘wait for my next video’, if that’s really happening, it should be a ‘we gotta stop this now’”.

          And then I thought about the high production value of his videos. They were professional level, which would take a budget. Someone threatening such powerful enemies wouldn’t have a budget, they’d have problems created by those enemies (because I never ended up in that “our enemies are simultaneously strong and weak” mindset). I didn’t realize at the time how profitable his schemes were and that he could easily pay for professional-level feature-length videos, but by the time I understood that, I saw his grift for what it was.

          Lol I remember being frustrated by the normies that kept dismissing it, but getting caught up in the denial shit from within sounds even more frustrating.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            This reminds me of when I kinda realized Fox News was pure evil because I saw them talking about how Obama was this crazy tyrant who was plotting to destroy the nation…

            And I just asked the guy on the TV “Wait, if he’s a Tyrant who doesn’t care about the Constitution hellbent on this evil, flaunting it as you say… Then why hasn’t he ordered your execution? Why are you on the number 1 rated News program talking about this in broad daylight in a high definition television that’s just sitting casually in the middle of this Hardee’s?”

            And then that’s when the lady behind the counter is like “Sir, this is a Wendy’s”

            and I’m like “I am a Ma’am, and this is a Hardee’s!”

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Probably comes from the beef itself (corrected by someone else, came from the onions) since it’s an outbreak on a wide scale.

    McDonald’s workers where I live don’t wear gloves yet there’s no outbreak. Wearing gloves isn’t more sanitary (it increases the odds that people won’t clean their hands often enough), you still touch the gloves to put them on, if your hands are dirty the gloves are contaminated, if someone touches the gloves box with dirty hands then the surface is contaminated and cross contamination can happen every time someone takes a pair of gloves.

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      THANK YOU.

      It’s not gross because he’s not wearing gloves, it’s gross because he probably never washes his hands after digging in his ass all day.

      Get your reasons this man is disgusting straight people!

      I wrote a similar comment about this exact same situation on another post but from a more healthcare oriented perspective. Specifically that unless you have open cuts / sores on your hands as a healthcare worker, clean but nonsterile gloves do not protect the patient! They are an OSHA requirement in place to protect the worker from exposure to bodily fluids and caustic cleaning chemicals. And for chemo you glove twice.

      Sterile gloves, which are used to protect a patient from infection and are used for surgeries and specific types of bedside procedures like urine catheterization, are packed in sealed packages in single pairs and must be applied in a highly specific way by a trained individual, the minimum license usually being an LPN and more often an RN.

      Unless that beef patty is acidic enough to burn your hands while preparing it (and if it is I shudder to think what it would do to a stomach) gloves out of a 100-count box ain’t protecting anybody from anything and at their worst are bamboozling people out of washing their damn hands.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Plus, consider how much plastic waste that comes to. I’ve seen people describe them changing gloves several times an hour to comply with food safety laws. We don’t have outbreaks of this shit because people wash their hands and don’t rely on gloves.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Cross contamination is so much worse than people think it is.

      Everything is pretty much contaminated all the time.

      I’d still want the illusion of the workers trying to be sanitary by wearing gloves.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        How about they actually are sanitary by washing their hands instead of relying on putting their dirty hands in gloves that they never clean?

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            They’ll be even less if they don’t feel their hands being dirty because they’re wearing gloves.

            Cross contamination, ever heard about it? If you touch your gloves with contaminated hands then the gives are contraindicated, if you touch the box with contaminated hands then anyone who touch the box to get gloves are contaminating they’re gloves. The more shit you touch, the more you increase the odds of cross contamination, it’s that simple.

            You don’t know what these gloves touched during manufacturing, that doesn’t scare you? They’re not sterile, says so on the box. Even if they were, the second the box gets opened sterilization goes out the window because it’s not a controlled environment and everyone is using the same box.

            Gloves in the food industry are there to keep your fluids to yourself if you hurt your hands, the only other reason to use them is because of people like you who wrongly believe they’re more sanitary than just working with clean hands.

            • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I know cross contamination very well.

              I trust non-sterile gloves over supposedly “washed” hands, every day of the week.

              The number of people that use the toilet without washing, or even rinsing their hands afterwards is insanely high. People are disgusting.

              Simply put, I don’t trust fast food gloves to be sterile, never said I did. I just think they’re likely to be cleaner than the unwashed hands inside of them.

              Yes, they’re likely cross contaminated, but by the time I’m accepting the risk of having someone else prepare my next meal, i want to reduce the harm they can do to me as much as I can.

              Cross contaminated gloves are going to be less harmful than the hands that contaminated them.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                And these people contaminated their gloves when putting them on.

                Cross contaminated is contaminated, simple as that.

                Sorry buddy but I’ve got my certification in hygiene and sanitary conditions in a kitchen environment, my girlfriend does as well, she is also trained to give the course and is a dietician trained to work in healthcare. Those gloves are there for show to reassure people like you, that’s it that’s all.

      • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Food service workers do not scrub down like OR personnel. They really need to wash their hands routinely and wear hairnets and not touch their privates. The whole thing of Subway employees donning a new pair of gloves for each sandwich is just theatre. Go into any professional kitchen away from public view and you will not see the cooks and chefs wearing gloves.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Surgeons wear sterilized gloves. Do you think those 100 gloves boxes are sterile?

        How come food poisoning isn’t an issue where I live if cooks don’t wear gloves even though it’s the governmental norm? And I mean, in restaurants, in hospitals, in long term care buildings… No issues, no gloves… Weird right?

        Also, did you know that healthcare workers mostly don’t wear gloves unless there’s a risk THEY will be exposed to YOUR fluids? Same reason over here we still wear gloves in professional kitchens when there’s a risk that our fluids will come in contact with the food, i.e. if we cut ourselves.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I never said it was, I said it’s ridiculous to think that gloves that come in boxes and aren’t meant to be used in sterile environments are cleaner than properly cleaned hands.

            Also, keep insulting people like that and you won’t go far in life.

  • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is a double-whammy PR nightmare.

    Are we going to do what happened with Jack in the Box in the naughts and start associating E Coli with McDonalds? I remember hearing that FUD so much back then and now that the shoe is on the other foot, I wonder what will happen. 🤔 Not to engage in the fast food wars or anything, but also fuck McDonalds for helping this fat ass at all.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      As much as I enjoy shitting on McDonald’s, I don’t think McDonald’s corporate had anything to do with this. I’m pretty sure this was a franchise.

      That being said, McDonald’s may need to revisit some of the restrictions in their franchise agreements with regard to direct participation in political campaigns. A candidate visiting a location is one thing, but this restaurant directly arranged and participated in this nonsense.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The owner of this franchise is a right-winger who has been fighting minimum wage raises and probably thinks those pencil-pushers at corporate can kiss his ass LOL.

        • WldFyre@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          It stands for Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt.

          I’ll be honest, though, I only really ever see it used in borderline cult-like environments, like cryptocurrency or Star Citizen. It’s a very weird term to use IMO

      • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I just meant that it last a lot longer than the few months it was a real problem. Like, I feel like we all talked about it for years and it affected their business.

        I somehow expect that won’t happen here considering how popular McD is worldwide, that’s all I mean.

      • Bob@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not that bad unless you get a shitload on there. It’s not even as bad as cutting your finger with a knife, I’d say.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is all media just dog piling on Trump.

    The diseases he spreads are WAY worse than e coli.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Isn’t Trump a germaphobe?

      I just looked it up and apparently it’s a lie he made up when asked whether he enjoys getting peed on.

    • lovely_reader@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, he didn’t do that either. I read that they asked him to and he said that his hands were nice and clean already.

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Love it when people handle money with a gloved hand. They didn’t understand the concept.

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wow, someone has actually died as a result of this McDiddles E. Coli outbreak? Imagine living your whole ass life, doing regular shit, being a regular ass person, and then dying to a mcdouble. WTF. Just another reason I rarely let other people cook my food.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Every october he dresses up and pretends he’s the spookiest thing he can imagine. This year he’s one of the poor ghosts that make his fries.

  • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    When he went to the bathroom earlier to do the mud pie… he must have used too small of a slice of toilet paper when he wiped, and he got mud pie on his tiny hands, and then he touched the fries, and then someone ate the fries, and now they are sick off of his mud pie.