• randoot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not a terrible idea initially, blend in with farm equipment, excellent off road capability, small and nimble. However there’s a reason Geneva conventions require military personnel and equipment to be distinct from civilians.

    Do you want all your civilian farmers blown up? Because this is how you do that.

  • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Does anyone remember the Forgotten Hope mod for BF42? A few maps had driveable tractors which were literally slower than the player walking speed.

    At least this is an upgrade from those.

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Ancient John Deere, while they were still good. I highly approve.

    Bringing a modern day John Deer to the battle field would result in being stalled while waiting for a proprietary software update, which is suboptimal while under artillery fire.

      • neidu2@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not sure when it started, plus my personal experience with JD stems from a tractor that was built in the 70’s. I think the model was 1033 or thereabouts.

  • BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Those are some big bolts! I would think dropping nails on the road would be more dangerous than dropping bolts, though, for attacking enemy tires.

    (City boy, not even a pleeb, so everyone else knows those are not just big bolts except me)

  • Tobberone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I see the Ukrainian alt army got upgradw on the infantry side.