https://drillbitsusa.com/product-category/solid-carbide-drill-bits/

You don’t use solid carbide drill bits with a hand drill but with mills and cnc machines.

https://www.mcmaster.com/product/3723A51

The company I worked for made tungsten nozzles, they had to be welded using atomic hydrogen welding. One day a bottle of hydrogen shows up and receiving rejected it, we had the supplier label it protium and it went right through.

Rocket nozzles are commonly made of tungsten, there are more than a few manufacturers in the US. Drill bits can be made of tungsten carbide. Armor piercing weapons use tungsten too. All of these have industries in the US.

Some people have trouble getting specific nutrients from plants or not enough from plants.

B12 (anemia), D3 (osteoporosis, heart disease), Iron (anemia),

I feel like there is going to be an exploding iPhone story in a year.

Your fatal assumption is that the Palestinians want peace too. They were given pipes to create water lines, they turned the pipes into rockets. You can’t have piece when neither side wants it.

I’m putting the percent of factory lada parts in that at 5%.

The Doolittle raids are fairly well know but the fire bombings carried out after that were not. The E-46 cluster bomb was pretty terrible 3 - 5 seconds after hitting the ground a small explosion would ignite and spread flaming napalm. The updraft from the fires was so bad some bombers lost control and crashed.

Someone was paid to push dirt over a small hole to build a runway not dig for bombs.

It’s not states estimates it’s estimates to create 4,000 Terrawatt hours of generation capacity (fossil fuel capacity in the US). To put that in context that’s 2,000 Hoover dams $1,600,000,000,000 or 60 years of spending the whole GDP. Looks like my 30 year forecast was overly optimistic.

Transportation has technicological hurdles, no amount of effort can solve this problem without breakthroughs in technology. It’ll be a long time before there is even a path to eliminating fossil fuels for transportation.

You can’t just cut and paste progress forward. Battery technology is still two or three decades away from being able to fully replace fossil fuel use. Lithium batteries are not the answer there’s just not enough lithium and it can’t be refined fast enough. Even completely replacing fossil fuel electricity generation would take three decades and there’s no technological hurdles, it’s just scaling manufacturing and construction resources to build that many plants. The scale of these efforts is hard to grasp.

The OP wanted a complete stop of production of fossil fuels a decade ago. That is a completely different statement than we need to curb fossil fuel use.

Assume people that who said “we need to stop producing fossil fuels a decade ago” really ment we need to do more to end fossil fuels usage in the next decade?

I don’t assume all climate activists have the moronic opnion that we need to transition to shit tech, just the ones who say we need to be off fissile fuels a decade ago.

Grid wise with nuclear we have the capability of not using fossil fuels. Transportation wise we are decdades away before we have the capability.

We don’t have a means to replace energy needs today and we were even further away a decade ago.

It’s crazy to think those are the only choices.

Kinda dumb to call for the end of fossil fuels a decade ago.

When someone calls for ending something last decade it required immediate action now.

What’s your plan to keep society functioning with the immediate end of fossil fuels?