• anon6789@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Lol I ask myself this all the time!

    Just hit 3200 this week, and I get maybe 1-2 posts a month not from me. I get so excited when someone else does one!

    I only started posting daily because I really love what I share, so I’d be sourcing all the stuff just for me. If you’re doing this as a job, you’re going to burn out. I try to post 3 or 4 things a day and have a week or 2 of posts built up in a drafts folder for slow news days or days where I feel like crap and I can keep it going. That’s a labor of love though. If it’s something I wasn’t all in on, it would suck to do all that work for free.

    Check out the !fedigrow@lemm.ee community if you want to discuss the growing pains here. It’s mainly us crazy dedicated few talking about growing our communities.

      • anon6789@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s funny, as I typically do not like attention, especially from strangers.

        I do like researching and teaching people things though, so it is really fun to hear people say “wow, I never knew this was that interesting” or when they ask me questions I don’t know the answers to and I end up reading about something I never thought to look into. I got asked some especially good questions this week, and it was a lot of fun coming up with good answers to share, so we all got a little smarter together. Fun stuff!

  • Andrew@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well, there’s the The 90-9-1 Rule for Participation Inequality in Social Media and Online Communities, which suggests:

    Summary: In most online communities, 90% of users are lurkers who never contribute, 9% of users contribute a little, and 1% of users account for almost all the action.

    So whatever number you’re looking for, it’s 1% of that. Not that subscriber count means much, especially for older communities that have 10’s of thousands of subscribers who aren’t even using the platform any more.

    • bamfic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      My god it’s a power law! Like damn near everything in biology, sociology, history, politics, and economics.

    • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not that subscriber count means much, especially for older communities that have 10’s of thousands of subscribers who aren’t even using the platform any more.

      Agreed, active users are a better metric.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I expect the numbers have probably gotten worse over time, but it is a decent rule of thumb.

      It also requires making sure the community will accept content from new members. It is fine to enforce rules, but overzealous enforcement can push out other active members.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    I guess it depends on the subscribers? Most of the time people just subscribe to communities because they want that kind of content. Look at stuff like the HistoryMemes community. It’s got hundreds of subscribers based on the amount of upvotes posts get, but the only realy person contributing is PugJesus.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      There are more contributions now than there used to be, but if no one has posted in a day, I try to make a post.

      … I still post most days.

      It takes a large userbase. I remember on The Old Place a community might need 2 or 3 thousand subscribers before it became truly self-sustaining. The more esoteric and obscure the knowledge or material needed to post, the more subscribers you need - meme communities can hit it at 2-3 thousand, while others, like history communities, can reach 5k and still be reliant on a small number of contributors.

    • Sunshine @lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I would say once the community you created reaches 300 subscribers, the community would care enough to take over and keep posting.

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    My community (on other account) has 200 subs and it dies when I stop posting so I’d say the answer is more than 200

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    i think this is one of the things that’s going to end up driving away most of the reddit users in the future.

    most people came to the lemmyverse because of reddit’s enshitification and are trying to turn lemmy into diet reddit by recreating the things that they liked about reddit; but lemmy was always intended to be political at its core and that core is deeply unpalatable to most of reddit & its refugees so they’ve mostly self sorted into their own instances and doing so has caused further issues for themselves, including rendering most of their communities inactive.

    lemmy works for me because i used to be active in reddit’s political subs before the enshitification and that taught me how to tolerate shit takes from misguided tankies and clueless liberals alike and the people who are too rigid in their views to learn will leave.