• Cypher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    being able to change the body with HRT.

    Artificial changes to a body are just that, artificial.

    Inserting an rfid chip under my skin doesn’t make me a credit card. Taking some hormones doesn’t make you female.

    This incessant boundary shifting and virtue signalling that everyone must play along with the artificial and pretend it is reality will never see broad public acceptance.

    Changing gender is real, changing sex is not and you could go ahead and provide a definition of sex that is holistic and entirely changeable with current technology if you disagree.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not artificial. The hormones aren’t native to the person, but it’s not changing their body by replacing components with mechanical things. Your body has different amounts of testosterone and estrogen as is. It’s just changing those amounts artificially, but the changing the body makes following that are natural biological processes.

      In your analogy though, how would giving you the function go a credit card not make you a credit card? If the effect is identical, then how are you not that thing? Sure, you’d also be other things, but that doesn’t exclude being another. If you have the outcome of being able to purchase things using your credit account, you are in effect a credit card. If you have the outcome of male attributes, you are in effect a male.

      Again, you’re arguing for some strict binary “biological” definition of sex. The primary sex characteristics, that you seem so fond of, can be removed. If this is your requirement, what happens when these are removed? You dodged this and are implying an unchanging definition now, so primary sex characteristics are not the requirement? If not, what is and what effect does HRT play on it now?