cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/32524524

Generated Summary below:

Video Description:

Our interview with the president of Iran.

Generated Summary:

Main Topic:

The video announces an upcoming interview with the President of Iran, Mosoud Pezeshkian, and explains the reasons behind conducting the interview.

Key Points:

  • The interview is with Mosoud Pezeshkian, the President of Iran.
  • The interview aims to provide American citizens with accurate information and a different perspective.
  • The interviewer acknowledges the historical animosity and potential conflict between the US and Iran.
  • The goal is to understand the Iranian perspective, especially given the possibility of future conflict.
  • The interviewer hopes the interview will help Americans form their own informed opinions.
  • The interview is confirmed and will be released soon.

Highlights:

  • The video emphasizes the importance of hearing directly from the Iranian President to gain a better understanding of Iran’s views.
  • It acknowledges the sensitive nature of interviewing a leader from a country with a strained relationship with the US.
  • The interviewer expresses a desire to provide viewers with information that is often unavailable through mainstream media.

About Tucker Carlson Network:

We’re building an alternative to legacy media

What is TCN?

Tucker Carlson Network is the new streaming platform that is home to exclusive all-new content from Tucker Carlson. We will regularly be releasing new video content that tells the stories that matter and helps you make sense of the world around you. Why We Founded TCN

News coverage in the West has become a tool of repression and control. Reporters no longer reveal essential information to the public; they work to hide it. Journalists act as censors on behalf of entrenched power. They have contempt for the public. They hate the truth.

Democracy can’t function in a society like this. Voters can’t know what they’re voting for. People do understand they’re being manipulated, and they resent it. The population becomes angry and paranoid. Things fall apart.

There’s only one solution to a propaganda spiral like the one we’re living through, and it’s telling the truth about the things that matter — clearly and without fear. That’s our job. We plan to do it every day, no matter what.

We are the sworn enemies of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. We believe the corporate media is broken beyond repair, and the only way forward is to build something better.[1]

  1. [1] https://tuckercarlson.com/about ↩︎

  • PhilipTheBucketA
    1·
    12 hours ago

    This is so fascinating lol

    Their dissenting views are more welcomed than the continued push of the Western regime’s propaganda we see from the Main Stream Media (MSM) since the day we are born.

    How would you contrast Carlson’s dissenting views with Mandami’s?

    Like what does Carlson think about Gaza, and what does Mandami? How do their views differ in that regard?

    Do you know what show Carlson used to host and where, that was his big entrance into mainstream media, and why he got fired from it? There’s a specific reason he got fired that is interesting. Also, there’s another specific reason he just got fired from the mainstream media, but that one’s a broader topic that gets into the difference between “a viewpoint” and the objective provable truth, which is pretty relevant to your whole shtick here. But, I’m asking about the first time he got fired, not the most recent one.

    Isn’t the fact that Carlson was extremely acceptable to the mainstream media, and they to him, apparently up until the point when he started costing them historic sums of money recently, relevant to your whole argument here? His whole thing used to be talking on the mainstream media in exchange for the MSM funding him to say a message they found to be acceptable.

    Also what did Mandami used to do before he got into politics? Do you think he has sway with the working class?

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.worldOP
      1·
      10 hours ago

      Mandami is a liberal, with some ‘progressive’ views, and Carlson is a conservative, with some ‘libertarian’ views.

      They both hold some populist views.

      Mandami’s views are similar to AOC’s early pseudo-populist views that appealed to the working class, similar to Bernie Sanders.

      Carlson is more like Dave Smith. They are both willing to listen and talk with others they don’t agree with. They also talk and learn from Professor Jeffrey Sachs.

      They are both critical of the genocide Israel, with the full support of the United States, is doing to the Palestinian people. Their views differ on specifics.

      Yes, I know the shows Carlson was on and the reasons he was ‘fired.’ It has been a while, but I remember the basics.

      I think Rachel Maddow and Tucker Carlson share similarities in some of the lawsuits they faced for their shows.

      MSM and Tucker were at the hip until he started going against the status quo. Now with his new show, he is even more open about his dissident views that do not align with the oligarchy talking points.

      Mamdani “worked as a foreclosure prevention and housing counselor, assisting lower-income non-white homeowners in Queens with eviction notices and efforts to remain in their homes.”

      He does have sway with the working class in New York. Similar to Bernie Sanders, AOC, and others and their districts.

      FYI: I am more aligned with Sabby Sabs, RBN, and Jimmy Dore than Mamdani and Carlson.

      Edit:

      1. Name, Zachs to Sachs
      • PhilipTheBucketA
        1·
        3 hours ago

        Yes, I know the shows Carlson was on and the reasons he was ‘fired.’ It has been a while, but I remember the basics.

        Which were?

        I think Rachel Maddow and Tucker Carlson share similarities in some of the lawsuits they faced for their shows.

        When was Rachel Maddow proven in court to have lied on purpose about something super important and cost her parent company almost a billion dollars?

        Or if not that, what similarities did you mean?

        MSM and Tucker were at the hip until he started going against the status quo.

        He was always going against “the status quo.”

        Carlson said immigration makes the country “poorer, dirtier and more divided”.

        Carlson expressed his support for Donald Trump’s candidacy and his positions, such as his proposed “Muslim ban”, and criticized the other Republican candidates for not similarly making immigration a core issue.

        Carlson opposes abortion and has said it is the only political issue he considers non-negotiable.[1][292][293] Carlson has described Roe v. Wade as “the most embarrassing court decision handed down in the last century”.[294]

        Carlson has also said that he does not consider climate change a threat.[336] Carlson argues that global warming will have many positive effects on Earth, namely “more arable land in places like Canada and northern Europe”.[337]

        Carlson said “Iraq is a crappy place filled with a bunch of, you know, semi-literate primitive monkeys, that’s why it wasn’t worth invading.”.[364]

        In a July 2018 interview about Russian involvement in U.S. elections, Carlson claimed that Mexico had interfered in U.S. elections “more successfully” than Russia by “packing our electorate” through mass immigration.[388]

        In May 2019, Carlson defended Trump’s decision to place tariffs on Mexico unless Mexico stopped illegal immigration to the United States. Carlson said, “When the United States is attacked by a hostile foreign power it must strike back, and make no mistake Mexico is a hostile foreign power.”[390]

        All of that was fine. The problem was when he cost them almost a billion dollars.

        His rhetoric hasn’t really changed, it’s just gained a new and extremely explicit allegiance to Russia. That’s pretty much the only difference between then and now (and he wasn’t fired during any of the time when he was expressing it).

        He was always anti-Israel, but I think that has more to do with the fact that they’re Jewish than that he has any sympathy with the Palestinians. For example he keeps constantly anguishing about the plight of Christian Palestinians, even though their numbers are pretty much negligible.