I think art deco is one of my favorites. It still has a clean, modern look that ages surprisingly well, even a century later.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I have a really big thing for 70s PNW homes done really, really well. The vaulted ceilings, open concept main areas with multiple levels, the sunken living rooms, the cedar used everywhere… just leave out the shag carpet and I’ll be A-OK.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Brutalism. The few brutalist buildings in my city are a welcome respite for the eyes against the blinged out crap they’re building nowadays.

    • Wahots@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      We have some here! Unfortunately, it’s the Soviet style, “cold” brutalist architecture that feels quite hostile. I like the “warm” aesthetic like the DC Metro with the light playing across the waffle ceiling, and the warm, brown hexagonal tile underfoot. This picture appears to be artificially brightened:

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Good brutalist architecture can take your breath away. It’s so solid, so permanent, so delightfully uncompromising.

    • LordGimp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Art deco.

      Use LotR to tell the difference. If it looks like it was made by the elves, it’s art nouveau. It if looks like the dwarves cranked it out, it’s art deco.

      Squares are a dead give away for dwarves. Knife ears don’t like square corners.

  • Nyanix@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m a sucker for that 60’s retrofuturism. The sleek, clean, and curved design of it all with such an optimistic view of the future is such a satisfying and happy vibe

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Brutalist

    Gorgeous brutalist, not “let’s cut corners and costs” Soviet brutalist, but Le Corbusier tier.

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Renaissance exterior of building. Carvings in concrete. Stone block buildings. Gargoyles. Corner decorations on ceilings.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    Any style older than 60 years that is not brutalism.

    Things used to have decor before, we’ve moved to a functionality only infrastructure, it’s always done in the cheapest way possible and it’s sort of depressing

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Prairie and Craftsman Bungalows. Unfortunately, I don’t think that either is a particularly energy efficient design.

  • FackCurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Haussmanian , as in multi-story mixed use buildings : 6 or 7 floors. Bottom floor is for businesses. Top floor is subdivided in small but cheap one bedrooms. Built in an H, O or U footprint with a central courtyard for the whole building to share. Facade can have art nouveau architectural elements but whatever is cheap is good.

  • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 day ago

    Art Deco and Art Nouveau both are great in my eyes. (Neo-)Gothic cathedrals and churches are also wonderful.

    But one more regional thing: I really like the Brick Gothic style. It is robust against wear and tear and still looks great.