- cross-posted to:
- historyillustrations@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- historyillustrations@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
Walking around to test the shoes was almost impossible, but usually gathered a little crowd to cheer the lassie on.
deleted by creator
Glory hole for a foot fetishist.
The ankle was all he needed.
You remain the best, The Picard Maneuver
Everyone continues to like you.
<3
The lady’s eyes were under their skirts in Victorian times?
BE NOT AFRAID
Just a single “whispering eye.”
deleted by creator
Must have been invented by a foot fetishist
who seeks glory
The guy fitting the shoe has a big smile, and it’s not his customer service face.
They’ll never know I’m licking their feet now!
“Oh, sorry, ma’am. I am preparing your foot with a warm sponge. I should have warned you ahead of time.”
We all can see his smile in the picture
Why oh why is no one concerned about the use of “and” here?
If they used “or” wouldn’t that imply that it only does one at a time?
I feel like this isn’t real
That whole period of history has to be made up
No, I think they meant “this is most likely an AI hallucination, NOT something that actually existed.”
If the sales person doesn’t have a foot fetish before they start using that device, they absolutely will by the end of it
That smile says it all
Inventor of the ‘glory sole’
Cos later on he’s going to tie her to a railway track.
Or he just likes the smell. He’s got the nose for it.
So it’s his fault for creating foot fetishists and the reason I had to fire someone when they kept asking other employees for feet pics.
I actually do this in work (minus the device). My job is wasted on me since I don’t have a foot fetish.
So the woman can’t see if the salesman is diddling himself while leering hungrily at her exposed ankle?
This is 100% way more reasonable that letting women put their own shoes.
/s just in case
How could she put on her own shoes while wearing a corset? Besides, that’s the servants’ job.
Good point. Also, found the time traveler.
Is this a new requirement from the US government for shoe stores or is this about history? I’m really unsure
This has generated significant interest and discussion, so I’m going to leave this up, but in the future, please submit only photographs and film on this comm.
Got it!
Didn’t the woman care about how the shoe looked on her? The device seems to also block the view for her.
Wonder what her leg is being executed for? What crime did it commit?
Nothing. It’s toetally innocent.
(…I’ll see myself out.)
It’s not being executed, just humiliated in front of all the other feet.
The other feet can like throw socks at it or something.
Excessive skin exposure
