• restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The FTC has been CRUSHING IT under the current leaders by actually enforcing existing rules. I hope Kamala tells those donors to pound sand.

  • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Ppl were celebrating Kamala raising $300 million in another post yesterday. We should NEVER applaud money in politics. IT IS A BRIBE. Keeping money out of American politics should be up there with universal health care. Regardless of the fact Republicans have more mega donors Democrats are still indebted to their mega donors. Applauding for having less mega donors is like applauding a criminal for only having one victim.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Isn’t the vast majority donations from regular folks contrary to (most) Republicans? I know Trump gets money left and right but I don’t think it’s technically going to the party/his campaign…

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They are mentally ill.

      If forced institutionalized wards become a thing again (hope not), the 1% better be the first through the doors.

  • psvrh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t they have enough money yet?!

    Are they not, ever, going to be satisfied? Does a tiny little modicum of restraint upset them that much?

    (don’t answer that!)

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s a Shame the Potentially First Female President and ONLY Person who can save the world from Fascism is about to Publicly Endorse the FIRING of the ONLY people in Government holding Billionaires accountable. But there’s literally NOTHING else she can do! What is she supposed to tell her Billionaire donors NO? That would be SILLY!

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Between this and her stance on Isreal Harris has excellent tools to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

    Please, Harris, fucking endorse popular positions… you’ll coast into the white house.

    • quicklime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You may have forgotten, in this party, winning is less important than pleasing the billionaires.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        As someone who voted for Hillary… believe me I have no doubts the depths of self-destruction democrats will go to to please donors.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m willing to bet they have more single issue Zionist voters to lose than single issue pro Palestinian votersthat will actually take the time to vote to win, not supporting Israel is her path to defeat, get out of your bubble.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not voting for either since I’m not from the USA.

          What I’m saying is that the Zionists are a bigger % of Democrat electors than the pro Palestinians electors that are waiting on that to decide to get out and vote for the Democrats.

          If saying she’ll stop selling weapons to Israel means she’ll lose more votes than she’ll gain, what would be the political advantage to saying it? Maybe that’s exactly what she wants to do once elected, right now the goal is to make sure she’s elected in the first place though!

          Look at the pro Israel vs pro Palestine age distribution and then look at the % of people that don’t vote by age, you’ll realize that making promises to age groups that never bothers voting won’t win elections (and the groups that don’t vote never did, there’s nothing new to it).

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            making promises to age groups that never bothers voting won’t win elections

            That’s a self-fulfilling justification for doing whatever you were already doing. Republicans don’t vote for Democrats either, but holy fuck do Democrats ever bend over backwards to please them anyway.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Thing is, even in places where there are parties that cater to the younger electors, they don’t come out to vote. Where I live 18-35 are under 50% with 65+ close to 80%, that’s with guaranteed 4h off work to vote and a left wing party that truly is left wing with younger candidates and other options all over the spectrum.

              Not all places only have two options but even with more choices young people don’t care about elections.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Thing is, even in places where there are parties that cater to the younger electors, they don’t come out to vote.

                When Biden stepped aside, young people registered to vote in greater numbers than when Taylor Swift told them to.

                Listening to young people generates enthusiasm. But that would be bad for people who support genocide for the love of genocide. And foreign actors trying to influence US foreign policy.

                Capitulating to Republicans gains nothing, but the party keeps doing it anyway.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  They registered, they have yet to vote.

                  You’re allowed to look at examples from outside the US to form an opinion you know?

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Crypto bro here. Gensler has been doing an amazing job. He’s been going after the scams and consistently applying the same Howey Test we’ve had for a century. It is perfectly clear in this case; the Howey deniers are bullshitting us because they have invested financially and emotionally in scams.

    • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I expect they already got what they want, killing progressive enthusiasm and getting her to publicly back off wealth tax rates

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Dollars to doughnuts they are both working to close the loop holes the 1% are abusing through both of their organizations to infinitely short the stock market. Fight on you radical monkeys. Fight on.