I think a little clarification is needed. No. I don’t actually think everyone there is insane. I don’t care about the bans so stop trying to use that. HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point

Edit: Feel free to keep trying to brigade me. It’s not going to scare me to take this down

  • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    As it’s always been, they cope with the horrible events with satirical, sarcastic humor. And, in the middle of that will be a well-reasoned, nuanced, and quite serious post.

    Oh yes, they are so funny, misunderstood, thoughtful and nuanced thinkers.

    F them and f you for defending them.

    This ~1800 comment thread about whether lemm.ee should defederate with them is all you need for some eye opening, in case anyone needs that.

    https://lemm.ee/post/4543536

    Above screenshot is from said thread.

    The comrade in it actually suggests that there is a time and place for such rhetoric, it is just not right here, right now. you have to think politically and wait for your moment!

    • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      The comrade in it actually suggests that there is a time and place for such rhetoric

      Perhaps now is the time.

      The kulaks were not an ethnic minority persecuted by the bolsheviks as a scapegoat for society’s ills. They were the economic class directly responsible for many of those ills. They were the capitalists of the peasantry, enclosing land and claiming ownership over what should have been the common means of production, precisely the kind of group that communists the world over want to destroy in order to liberate the majority of people.

      When it was written that the kulaks were to be “liquidated”, it did not mean that they were to be mass executed, it meant that their private property was to be moved into public ownership, ending the existence of the kulak class and making them into regular workers.

      As is the case in every single campaign of economic or social justice, the privileged class fought back with everything they had. Kulaks contributed to the Soviet Famine of 1930-1933 by mass slaughtering their cattle and burning their fields. Kulaks hoarded grain, took the wealth that they had stolen from their neighbors and fled the country, plotted sabotage and insurrection against the workers’ movement. And for those crimes, many Kulaks were caught and executed.

      So if the original commenter’s great grandparents were kulaks who “suffered at the hands of the soviet union,” they deserved it.

      • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        🤭

        You guys don’t even hide it anymore. You’re openly advocating for brutal police regimes. The jokes write themselves. Convenient.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          You don’t get to call directing state power against the petite bourgeoisie a brutal police regime when your government is supporting the most brutal dictatorships in Africa, whose violence is directed at the working class.

          • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            Yeah I get to do that, because that’s what happened factually, sorry. No amount of whataboutism will change that. I don’t care about Western imperialists, fuck them too.

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              The vital context is wielding state power against internal threats. Which literally every state must do to continue to exist. It’s not whataboutism to point out that the state you currently live in is currently doing far worse, for far worse reasons in a context where your criticism can only be used for anticommunism.

              Would you say it’s constructive for an Israeli to be critical of gay rights in Palestine? Of course not, because divorced of context, it only carries water for imperialism

              • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 days ago

                The problem is the violence of the totalitarian regimes you defend harms innocents too, which is why serious communists shouldn’t advocate for that kind of power abuse any more than they should advocate for Western imperialism. It’s not that hard.

                • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 days ago

                  Nobody is advocating power abuse. One of the books I try to get people to read, Life and Terror in Stalin’s Russia contextualizes the scale of and how such abuses occurred in a much more useful criticism than “communism bad Stalin evil, that’s why you can’t ever do anything about rightists organizing against the state”.

                  A good accompaniment to illustrate what it looks like and what the consequences are when the left fails to take appropriate action once in power is The Jakarta Method

                  • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    11 days ago

                    That’s precisely the extent of my criticism. Understanding stalinism instead of just demonizing it is a good thing, if only to avoid repeating the same mistakes. But the end doesn’t justify the means. Apologism is not OK.

                    It’s OK to take a stance against power abuses, and vital to denounce them if you consider yourself a leftist.