• PhilipTheBucketOPMA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    People on every other instance are able to say whatever they want, they can have open discussion, they can criticize .ml or NATO or Trump or the Democrats. Which is as it should be.

    The mythology that .ml enacts its insane level of censorship because it’s helping people “crack through the programming” by expressing viewpoints and arguments that are also allowed everywhere else, and the censorship is a necessary part of making that possible (by banning any disagreement shielding it from the commonsense arguments that generally can debunk it), is some Karl Rove shit.

    • jackeroni@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The only serious censorship on Lemmy is coming from neolib-psyop instances like .world trying to control the narrative

      • PhilipTheBucketOPMA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        Like I said, you will have precisely 0 problem in telling whatever narrative on Lemmy.world or wherever. You are spouting a comfortable myth which is commonly believed on .ml but has no basis in reality and is in fact 100% backwards.

        I’ll prove it: Tell me the narrative, and I guarantee you we will be able to talk about it for any length of time without anyone coming in and doing any serious censorship.