REgon [they/them]

  • 1 Post
  • 52 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 19th, 2024








  • Nationally over 20% of adult americans have a literacy proficiency at or below Level 1

    mac-concern so first of all “nationally” is redundant, so don’t jot that down.
    Secondly: 1/5 of adult americans can’t read AT ALL?? That’s… that’s too much.

    Christ that page needs and editor

    The definition of literacy has changed greatly; the term is presently defined as the ability to use printed and written information to function in society, to achieve one’s goals, and to develop one’s knowledge and potential

    Add quotation marks ffs

    Modern jobs often demand a high literacy level, and its lack in adults and adolescents has been studied extensively.

    Not really relevant to the discussion of literacy in the US. Certainly not in the introduction.

    According to a 1992 survey, about 40 million adults had Level 1 literary competency, the lowest level, comprising understanding only basic written instructions.

    You are adding it as a source, just write the claim and add the year the claim was made.

    A number of reports and studies are published annually to monitor the nation’s status, and initiatives to improve literacy rates are funded by government and external sources

    Should be the first sentence if you’re going to include it at all.






  • REgon [they/them]@hexbear.nettotechnology@hexbear.netI hate agile
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Death to America and kill every american and start with the veterans, then the troops, then the cops, then you, then the politicians and if there’s still any americans around we might have a group huddle and talk about it.
    “Optics” is a goof and you’ve been cooked to believe in something pointless. Democrats are being called commies no matter what, the green new deal made them cry about NWO and adrenochrome, optics is a ghast
    If your gut reaction to seeing something you dislike is to do tone policing about how it might mwake widdle wepwuwikwans sad then you are no friend of mine and I am fairly sure you are no friend of @2Password2Remember@hexbear.net either. If you give a shit about any of this, then go waste everyones time in a place that matters at least.

    You were the type who would try to change the chant at demonstrations. You ratted on people who tagged cameras. Death to america and death to types like you.





  • I am happy to see you’ve taken the Dalai Llamas advice and dropped the weird faux-casual tone you attempted before. May this be the first step on your way to enlightenment.

    Like fishing in a barrel with a shotgun.

    > Say something stupid
    > Get called out
    > Heh sure triggered you :smuglord:

    It’s so funny how you swarm like pirhannas with penis-envy when you get called out.

    It’s just me responding to you, and you seem to be the only one talking about being envious of dicks.
    I gotta give you this, you’ve mastered the weird non-sequiteur. This is the second time in a row I’m baffled as to what motivated your strange response.


  • REgon [they/them]@hexbear.nettoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlWhat word or term annonys you?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    “Anecdotal evidence” lmao. Yeah bud the historical analysis and the reference to trends are super anecdotal. Sorry for not providing you with leagues of documents in what I thought was a chill civil interaction.

    Aight.

    rage-cry <- You. I cannot imagine getting this butthurt over a casual conversation.

    Iono why I tried interacting with a hex user in the first place. It always seems to end up in derision and self-labeled omniscience.

    If you meet a person who stinks, then you’ve met a person who stinks. If everyone stinks, then you’ve stepped in dogshit - Dalai Llama. The Llama also told you to look inwards and be less of a redditor. Also to drop this weird faux-conversation tone you’ve suddenly adopted in an attempt to appear above it all. He said it’s cringe.

    Anyways here’s the poem with a significantly different meaning of sweet summers child - because of course it is. The meaning of sweet summer child only makes sense within the universe of GoT. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=mGQSAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA52#v=onepage&q&f=false - It is here referring a lovely breeze, a sweet child of the summer.
    And whoops what’s this? https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=Sweet summer child&hl=da Oh wow would you look at that, it sees a drastic increase alongside the release of the first season of GoT. Odd. Huh. I’d go into the interesting reasons for why the first usage doesn’t line up with the series release or the first book, but you’re being a whiny little pissant so now I’d rather not and hopefully annoy you some more.
    Fuck you