
Crazy how much that 1.5% could have changed
Crazy how much that 1.5% could have changed
Somehow it feels like this whole essay could be summarized in a single paragraph of, say, 3 proper sentences
Wasn’t STEAM supposed to be something specific, not a replacement of STEM? Idk, I just know the acronym because Angela Collier did a video.
Plenty of stuff that works much better for white guys that speak English and with the right accent, because that’s who they are mostly trained on (image/speech recognition, spell check and translation, lots of medical stuff but that’s not very tech). Not sure about straight.
Edit: oh the image said cis, not straight. That’s easier.
At least half of all US voters is okay with all this, no?
The only one that feels like a statement is leaving out one of L, G, B or T. But even then, honest mistakes aren’t a big deal.
The original had a sheep instead of Garfield
12 year old you (unknowingly) made the irreversible life change of going through the default puberty. Plenty of people regret making that choice.
Computer science: pi is O(1)
!yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com tends to side with the pro-AI side, it’s not very neutral
Any maths joke of this type will have obvious holes in it, that’s just how maths works
In that case, there’s no need to specify anything about the angles. Or, the characterisation the meme is playing with: a shape with four straight sides of equal length and right angles. Adding parallel to the meme’s version doesn’t help.
I’m just tired of this thread. Not only do Lemmy users have this weird urge to show off their high school maths knowledge to dunk on a joke that obviously only works because OP played with the definition, but they’re not even correct. The /r/mathmemes thread was much better.
Canon differential geometer hair
No it doesn’t. Right angles + equal length is a sufficient condition
This is why women get accused of being unfair debaters.
You don’t have to be “fair” when some rando starts debating you out of nowhere, same way you don’t have to do a proper duel when someone asks
I suddenly understand the Simpsons joke. Cool track.
Everything is political but what we are banning is the more clearer mainstream politics. We do not really want to know if this group we do not like lost/won somewhere.
There’s another way?