The high court’s 6-3 opinion along ideological lines found the law criminalizes bribes given before an official act, not rewards handed out after.

Eg: it’s ok to give Supreme Court Justices money after they rule in your favor because it’s normal and ok to regularly hand them amounts much larger than their salary. The Democrats on the court were the dissenters.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Justices that ruled that bribery as “gratuity” is legal:

    • John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States
    • Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice
    • Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice
    • Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice
    • Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice
    • Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice

    Justices that ruled that bribery is illegal:

    • Justices Elena Kagan, Associate Justice
    • Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice
    • Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice
  • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Supreme Court basically just ruled that it’s perfectly acceptable for officials to accept and even ask for bribes, just so long as they wait a few weeks after the service for which the bribe is meant to pay.

    Seriously. That’s exactly what this ruling in effect says - that bribes are only bribes if they’re paid before the service is rendered, and if they’re paid after, that’s perfectly fine.

    And people still wonder why I’m such a cynic…

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The dumbest part about this ruling is it treats every bribe as unrelated to every other bribe. The majority ignored the basic trait of every human with a prefrontal cortex, that we judge future planning by past experience.

      So even ignoring the “first bribe is free” effect of the decision, what will happen in effect is that legislators and politicians will pass laws they think will gain bribes, be paid by interests that benefit after the fact, and after that without a single word, have an understanding that such back-dated bribes can continue indefinitely. Regular, consistent bribery is legal and easy, under this ruling.

      • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They called it a gratuity to try to divert attention from the bludgeoningly obvious fact that it’s just a postdated bribe.

        This is what this country has come to. In the face of an ever-growing failure of the government to represent the will of the people because their influence has been bought and paid for by moneyed interests, the Supreme Court is legalizing bribery.

        Of course, it’s certainly not a coincidence that one of the institutions that’s been bought and paid for is the Supreme Court itself.

  • barkingspiders@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    seems like a good thread to plug https://represent.us

    they describe themselves as

    RepresentUs is America’s leading nonpartisan anti-corruption organization fighting to fix our broken and ineffective government. We unite people across the political spectrum to pass laws that hold corrupt politicians accountable, defeat special interests, and force the government to meet the needs of the American people.

    here’s their policy platform https://represent.us/policy-platform/

    they claim to have played a part in over 185 pieces of legislation (mostly at the state level) that contributed to their core platform https://represent.us/our-wins/

    here are their ongoing campaigns presented state by state https://represent.us/2024-campaigns/

    nobody and no organization are perfect but I feel like most people can find something to agree on here