• milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Oh dear. Usually the chair is so big it stands way above the floor.

        Also what about the table? Should that still be larger than the chair?

    • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Sorta. The function height(angle) needs to be continuous. From there it’s pretty clear why it works if you know the mean value theorem.

      • frank@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, I guess the assumption it takes is that there aren’t larger topographic changes for the other legs between their points, and that the legs are equal length. But I like it, it’s a fun one I’m trying next time

      • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Right. Somehow I was thinking only of the floor being uneven, not the table legs. Surely it’s trivial to have table legs sufficiently different to not fit on any arbitrary shape of floor?

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Haha yes :) I was somehow thinking for this type of problem, the usual case is the legs are uneven… because if the floor is uneven or not level the table will be uneven or not level regardless of whether it has 0, 1, or n legs. But I guess the problem is about “wobbling” not about being level.

          • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            If the table has three legs it will be stable on any floor no matter how uneven (up to some limit!). Won’t be perfectly flat, but won’t wobble.