The telegram app has a very nice interface, but I want to use a self hosted xmpp chat server.

Is there maybe a fork of telegram that makes it work with a self hosted xmpp server? I would imagine that this is possible.

If not, is there anything that at least gets close to how nice telegram UI is?

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Telegram isn’t open source, so I don’t think you’re going to find forks of it.

    I stand corrected. Telegram’s client is open source (GPL) and what OP is asking for is reasonable.

    • matcha_addict@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Telegram client is open source, and there are many forks of it with enhanced features (forkgram, nekogram, etc.)

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You are asking about the server, not the apps.

        This is another “I WANT EVERYTHING FOR CHEAP!” post in this thread, but with lower effort because this is easily searchable to find the answer.

        • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          OP already clearly stated he want to use XMPP. What OP is asking is some client features the functionality of Telegram client. Or a fork of Telegram client, gutted out every signle line of code interact with the backend, replace them with a XMPP client library.

            • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I think OP is quite clear that he wants something resembles to Telegram’s UI, but works with XMPP instead. The title is just part of the context. You still have to read the body, which uses terms “interface” and “UI”. This means he never intend something server side.

              I won’t say your comment is inaccurate, but taken out of context and misinterpret what the OP means.

        • matcha_addict@lemy.lolOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You are asking about the server, not the apps.

          No. Please refer to the third word in the body of my post, which spells “app”.

          This is another “I WANT EVERYTHING FOR CHEAP!” post

          Where? I am not seeing what you’re seeing. Feel free to quote my post to show where this is, and please demonstrate how it is “i want everything for cheap!” in all caps.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            The “app”, as you call it, only subscribes to the services provided. Whether you know it (apparently not), any features you described are on the server side (as to your post title). You are asking about the server, though you seem to not know it. Why else would you post in “self-HOSTED”. Applications aren’t hosted.

            Wow.

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    OP, I understand what you look for, but that’s not easy task. From my limited knowledge of apps development, achieving what you requested would likely be:

    1. Identify and remove all relevent code to the backend. Easier if it’s modular, very hard if they’re litrered everywhere.
    2. Chose a XMPP client library that have relavent extension support that can translate Telegram features that XMPP understands.
    3. Write an adaptor (if modular) to match the methods signature and translates calls to the client library. Or reimplement all the code you removed (if littered everywhere) with the client library.

    This is akin to swaping to a new engine for a car, with incompatible mounts. Diffcult to execute, and (I believe) low interest. You can try if you got the skills. I don’t and even I have, I will just use SimpleX which fits my needs.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      In theory you could use Telegram X and reimplement the tdlib API to create such a client. It wouldn’t be the main Telegram Android app, but Telegram X is in someways even nicer.

  • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    If you don’t strictly speaking need XMPP, you might want to checkout Jami which is a peer-to-peer based chat app with a fairly polished UI. It still definitely feels like beta software at times though, so more of a “be aware of it and check in on it” than “actively use this for all of your chats” sort of thing.