• rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Our business-critical internal software suite was written in Pascal as a temporary solution and has been unmaintained for almost 20 years. It transmits cleartext usernames and passwords as the URI components of GET requests. They also use a single decade-old Excel file to store vital statistics. A key part of the workflow involves an Excel file with a macro that processes an HTML document from the clipboard.

    I offered them a better solution, which was rejected because the downtime and the minimal training would be more costly than working around the current issues.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      downtime

      minimal retraining

      I feel your pain. Many good ideas that cause this are rejected. I have had ideas requiring one big downtime chunk rejected even though it reduces short but constant downtimes and mathematically the fix will pay for itself in a month easily.

      Then the minimal retraining is frustrating when work environments and coworkers still pretend computers are some crazy device they’ve never seen before.

    • Tar_alcaran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The library I worked for as a teen used to process off-site reservations by writing them to a text file, which was automatically e-faxed to all locations every odd day.

      If you worked at not-the-main-location, you couldn’t do an off-site reservation, so on even days, you would print your list and fax it to the main site, who would re-enter it into the system.

      This was 2005. And yes, it broke every month with an odd number of days.

    • V4uban@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      As weird as it may seem, this might be a good argument in favor of Pascal. I despised learning it at uni, as it seems worthless, but is seems that it can still handle business-critical software for 20 years.

      • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        What OP didn’t tell you is that, due to its age, it’s running on an unpatched WinXP SP2 install and patching, upgrading to SP3, or to any newer Windows OS will break the software calls that version of Pascal relies upon.

  • shadesdk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The company would bid on government contracts, knowing full well they promised features that didn’t exists and never would, but calculating that the fine for not meeting the specs was lower than the benefit of the contract and getting the buyers locked into our system. I raised this to my boss, nothing changed and I quit shortly after.

    • hactar42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve worked in IT consulting for over 10 years and have never once lied about the capabilities of a product. I have said, it doesn’t do that natively, but if that’s a requirement we can scope how much it would take to make it happen. Sadly my company is very much the exception.

      The worst I saw was years ago I was working on an infrastructure upgrade of a Hyper-V environment. The client purchased a backup solution I wasn’t familiar with but said it supported Hyper-V. It turns out their Hyper-V support was in “beta”. It wasn’t in beta. They were literally using this client as a development environment. It was a freaking joke. At one point I had to get on the phone with one of their developers and explain how high-availability and fail-over worked.

      • bpm@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I could very well have been that developer. Usual story, sales promised the world, that our vmware-based system would run on anything and everything, and of course it’s all HA and load balanced, smash cut to me on Monday morning trying to figure out how to make it do that before it goes live on Wednesday.

    • esadatari@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      eh DHCP isn’t really important right? obviously if it hasn’t changed since the 80’s why would you need to reboot your server.

      what are vulnerabilities?

    • drphungky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I worked in government contracting (and government, for that matter) for years and that blows my mind. I can’t remember the details, but if you even had a bad reviews, much less being found noncompliant, it could disqualify you entirely from some contract vehicles for a matter of years. Wild that there’s some agency that somehow lets people get away with fraud.

      Also, if that cost the government money, there’s a chance you could report that after the fact and make some money.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Might be local government. Me and sales have this argument pretty often

        Me: it is in the spec

        Sales: no one noticed it except you

        Me: thanks?

        Sales: no one is going to care

        Me: then take it out of the spec and resign everything.

        Sales: why are you making a big deal about this?

        Me: because it is in the spec that we signed and if we don’t honor the spec they can backcharge us.

        Sales: that won’t happen

        Me: you are right because we are going to follow the spec. If you don’t want me to please email me, the department head, and the client specifically ordering me not to follow the contract that we signed.

        • shadesdk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah I’m in Europe and our customers were municipalities buying healthcare related solutions. It happened after our little startup got taken over by a big player and they started getting involved in the contract bids.

    • forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Promising features that never existed is part and parcel to a lot of software sales, whether gov or private. Speaking from post-sales experience.

      • shadesdk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think it’s fine to promise them, but to claim they currently exist when you never plan to implement them is what I couldn’t support.

    • Tar_alcaran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The contractor I worked for was run by a man who used to say “if the contract says they’ll blow up the contractor on delivery, we’re putting in a bid and solve the problem later”

  • esadatari@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    i worked for a hybrid hosting and cloud provider that was partnered with Electronic Arts for the SimCity reboot.

    well half way through they decided our cloud wasn’t worth it, and moved providers. but no one bothered to tell all the outsourced foreign developers that they were on a new provider architecture.

    all the shit storm fail launch of SimCity was because of extremely shitty code that was meant to work on one cloud and didn’t really work on another. but they assumed hurr hurr all server same.

    so you guys got that shit launch and i knew exactly why and couldn’t say a damn thing for YEARS

  • pureness@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Geek Squad, We were flying under the radar upgrading Macbook RAM, until one day we became officially Apple Authorized to fix iPhones, which means we were no longer allowed to upgrade Macbook RAM since the Macbooks were older and considered “obsolete” by apple, meaning we were unable to repair or upgrade the hardware the customer paid for, simply because apple said it was “too old”. it was at this point in my customer interaction, that we recommend a repair shop down the road that isn’t held at gunpoint by apple ;)

  • LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Anybody knows that one waterfall attraction in the Southeast US? The one that advertises bloody everywhere? Waterfall is pumped during the dry seasons, otherwise there’d be nothing to see. Lots of the formations are fake, and the Cactus and Candle formation was either moved from a different spot in the cave, or is from a different cave in New Mexico. Management doesn’t want people to know that, but fuck 'em.

  • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    1-800-got-junk? doesn’t care at all about its environmental impact. No sorting what so ever happens to what goes on their trucks it all goes to landfills. All the ads will say they recycle and that they repurpose old furniture but I was threatened with being fired when I recommended donating antiques instead of dumping a load of furniture.

    More jobs and more profits comes before anything else in that company, including employee health and safety. Several times I was told to enter spaces we werent trained for (attics and crawl spaces) and carry waste I legally couldn’t transport (human/organic wastes and the laws states the driver is fined, not the company). One guy injured his shoulder during an attic job and was told to finish the shift or lose his job. Absoulte scum of a company with very sleazy management and possibly the labour board in their pocket as they kept “losing the files” when I tried to file a report with buddy’s shoulder (he was hesistant to report for fear of losing his job).

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Health insurance company I worked for would automatically reject claims over a certain amount without reviewing them. Just to be dicks and make people have to resubmit. This was over 25 years ago, but it’s my understanding many health insurers still pull this shit. They don’t care if it’s legal or not. Enforcement is lazy and fines are cheaper than medical claims.

    Obviously this is in the USA.

  • MrBodyMassage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    There is a million times more counterfeit/fake items at amazon than you think, and they dont care one bit to fix the problem

    • SweetBilliam@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I wrote a review about a counterfeit item I received. They never approved that one. I haven’t bought cologne from them since.

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I bought a bicycle light set (front and rear) a few years ago. They work fine (in fact, I still use the headlight; the rear still works, but it was replaced by a radar light), and I wrote a review. More recently, I was looking back through my purchases, and I came across the review I’d written, but the lights they were now selling on that page were a completely different design than the ones I had.

        I edited my review to note that the current lights didn’t match the ones I had, not that it’ll do any good with a million other reviews of those lights. I know Amazon doesn’t really care, but I very often see “There is a newer version of this item available here” links, so I’m surprised that this was possible.

    • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I recall watching a video about the nature of how things are stored at Amazon warehouses - basically if there are multiple sellers offering the same item it all goes in the same bin. Even if you are providing a genuine product, there’s a very good chance one of the other sellers is not, and that counterfeit gets sent out attached to your seller ID. Then you get a complaint for selling a counterfeit item someone else provided.

      Then when that seller is caught and booted, they just register another trademark with 5-10 random characters and do it again. This is causing a massive headache for the US Trademark Office as well.

    • netvor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I always thought there’s exactly 0 counterfeit/fake items at amazon, so … 0 times million … phew…

      /s

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I think there’s a lot, yet I also don’t doubt you.

      'Course, at this point so much of the stuff is the same randomly-generated-brand-name Chinese shit as EBay and Aliexpress have anyway that it doesn’t really matter anymore most of the time.

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Exactly why I only buy from Amazon when I can’t find it after searching elsewhere for a while.

    • wildebeesties@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the major issues is counterfeit baby products, specifically sleep products. In the US, sleep spaces for babies are highly regulated. The terms “bassinet, crib, and playard” are terms that can only be used for products that pass rigorous ASTM testing. If something doesn’t complete that testing then they are not allowed to use one of those terms in ads or on their manual. This is why you’ll see many products listed as “loungers” because they’re not safe for sleep. There are hundreds of products online that are horribly made and steal manuals of actual approved products. Amazon is notified (groups I’m in notify them) and they don’t care. There are also products that aren’t knock-off versions of things but just flat out lie and say a product is safe for sleep when it isn’t and will use one of the protected terms - which makes the sale of them illegal.

    • Paradox@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I bought a pepper grinder called the Pepper Cannon. Yes, its wonderfully overengineered and costs a fortune. But it’s made in the USA, and they’ve been pretty open with their startup process for making it.

      Few months ago I was browsing across amazon and lo and behold, some pepper grinders that look identical to the pepper cannon came up. They were all cheaper knockoffs, selling for a fraction of the cost, and outright stealing PCs industrial design. I didn’t buy one, as I don’t need one and didn’t really care enough to test if the mechanism was the same as the one I bought, but I did drop a line to the pepper cannon guys so they can try to get em delisted

      • Mikina@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Now I want a Pepper Cannon. Would you recommend getting it, before I ruin my hype by looking up the price or what is actually is? :D

        • Paradox@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Its really great if you like pepper. It puts out an absolute ton of it, and you’ll find yourself going through way more black pepper than you thought you ever could. And the grind settings are unrivaled; you can get tiny little faerie dusts of pepper, all the way up to big honkin flakes that work great on a steak. Whenever I’m doing a brisket or similar on the smoker, its great to have on hand

          Its milled out of a single billet of aluminum, the grinding mechanism js custom built, and the whole thing just screams quality.

          And you pay for it. They’re around $200

          There’s also a salt cannon, if you want the same sort of thing but built for salt. I got it because I like the matching pair, but you don’t strictly need it; salt is salt, regardless of where it was ground.

    • drphungky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      they dont care one bit to fix the problem

      Who is they? Warehouse workers? Because without getting into too many details, I know someone fairly high up at Amazon corporate, and if I recall correctly her colleague runs a whole…divison? I don’t know, largish multi-person unit…and their whole job is addressing the counterfeit problem. I think it’s just really hard to do.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well the easiest solution is to go back to having Amazon be the seller of products on Amazon, but we all one that ship sailed.

        But if the problem is shared bin storage, the solution isn’t free, but it’s also not as expensive as lots of buyer confidence:

        Tag every item with a QR code indicating its source when it comes into the distribution center. Use that code to identify the bad actors when there are returns and ban them.

        “But what about products not shipped by Amazon?”

        In that case, you know who sold and shipped the product, and if they can’t get their shit together they shouldn’t be allowed to work with Amazon.

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Amazon has a policy of binning items with the same UPC together, regardless of the source. What this means is if you buy a valid product and any vendor who is part of their warehouse storage system sells counterfeits, then there is a chance of you getting a counterfeit part, regardless of who you buy from. This reduces the number of locations required for a given item. It just requires that you trust your vendors to not counterfeit. If they were kept separate you could easily see who is selling counterfeits, but it would require more space.

        So Amazon has traded the ability to sell parts from verifiable vendors for short-term profits. At this point in the game, your best assumption is if there is any knock-off company selling the product you wish to buy you have no way of knowing it it’s legitimate or counterfeit. This is currently diluting their brand and will ultimately impact their sales, if not their profits.

        • squozenode@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Amazon makes something like 80% of their profit off of Amazon web services. They have no reason to give the tiniest crap about any physical product they will ever sell ever again.

  • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I quit a well known ecomm tech company a few months ago ahead of (another) one of their layoff rounds because upper mgmt was turning into ultra-wall street corpo bullshit. With 30% of staff gone, and yet our userbase almost doubling over the same period, they wanted everyone to continue increasing output and quality. We were barely keeping up with our existing workload at that point, burnout was (and still is) rampant.

    Over the two weeks after I gave my notice I discovered that in the third-party app ecosystem many thousands of apps that had (approved) access to the Billing API weren’t even operating anymore. Some had quit operating years ago, but they were still billing end-users on a monthly basis. Many end-users install dozens of apps (just like people do with mobile phones) and then forget they ever did so. The monthly rates for these apps are anywhere from 3 to 20 dollars per month, many people never checked their bank statements or invoices (when they eventually did, they’d contact support to complain about paying for an app that doesn’t even load and may not have for months or years at this point).

    I gathered evidence on at least three dozen of these zombie apps. Many of them had hundreds of active installs, and were billing users for in some cases the past three years. I extrapolated that there were probably in the high-hundreds or low-thousands of these zombie apps billing users on the platform, amounting to high-thousands to low-tens-of thousands of installs… amounting to likely millions per year in faulty and sketchy invoicing happening over our Billing API.

    Mgmt actually did put together a triage team to address my findings, but I can absolutely assure you the only reason they acted so quickly is because I was on the way out of the company. I’d spotted things like this in the wild previously and nothing had ever been done about it. The pat answer has always been well people are responsible for their own accounts and invoicing. I believe they acted on this one because I was being very vocal about how it would be ‘a shame’ if this situation ever became public, and all those end-users came after the company for those false invoices at one time. It would be a PR and Support nightmare.

    You have definitely interacted with this ecommerce platform if you shop online.

    • ki77erb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I recently discovered that somehow I set up billing for a VPN directly from the company and also through Google Play. I probably got a renewal email and just followed the instructions. I went back through my bank statements and I’ve been double charged for probably at least 2 years and just never noticed it. It was only about $10 a month. I just feel really stupid for not noticing it until now and it’s entirely my fault. I cancelled the one through Google Play. You live and you learn!

      • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        lmfao. Does the VPN company’s name start with a W by any chance? If so, I am very aware of that issue as well. 😂

      • booty_flexx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        ✅️ is a shopping platform

        ✅️ has an app ecosystem with a billing api

        ✅️ high probability that someone who shops online has interacted with a store on the platform

        ✅️ multiple rounds of layoffs w/ staff stretched thin

        ✅️ unclear ambitions of being a megaplatform, beyond what it already is

        I guess we’ll never know, lol

    • Veltoss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I guessing it’s Amazon’s old android app store? I remember lots of users having a lot of hope for that app store bringing competition and higher quality app and app store quality. Oh how naive we were.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I used to work for a cable company whose name rhymes with “bombast”. They offer a wifi service whose name is a derivation of the word “infinity”. Most of the hotspots for this wifi service are provided by the Bombast wireless routers that cable customers have in their homes. So if you’re a Bombast customer, you’re helping to pay the electrical bill and giving up bandwidth in order to provide Infinity wifi.

    Another fun Bombast story: the founder, a man who always wore a bowtie, died a few years ago. At a memorial service in his honor, a number of vice presidents and other executives (including my boss at the time) wore bowties. Everyone who wore a bowtie to the service was fired within a week.

          • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I have no idea why they were fired or who fired them - I just know that they were fired.

            Bombast had a lot of helplessly incompetent (and sometimes clinically insane) executives running things, but they never lasted that long. There seemed to be some sort of Avenging Angel of Death wandering the Bombast Center and culling the more useless examples of management. My bowtie-wearing boss was one of these and certainly deserved the axe, but I don’t know if this was true of the other members of the bowtie brigade.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      BT does the same exact thing in the UK lol. I thought it was common knowledge

    • SetheryVanDamn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The shared internet thing is a setting that comes turned on for Xfinity routers by default (aka the ones you rent from them). If you go into the settings of the router you can turn the wifi sharing setting off.

    • zuhayr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you disconnect your existing connection, and got a new one using another name, saying that you’re new occupant, you can get that new connection discount (over and over again).

      • 丂イ乇尺レノ刀ム@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ve never had to disconnect. Once the discount has expired, I just go online and check the prices for changing my internet speed. Most of the time there’s a discounted one (with a contract agreement of course). But I’ve been switching back and forth between different speeds for years and saved a lot of money that way. Also buy your own modem/router instead of paying rental fees for their equipment.

      • squozenode@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        With Time Warner you don’t even have to do that you can just call up and ask, they’ll probably give you the discount. They absolutely do not care.

      • Maslo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Careful, sometimes they’ll come out just to pull your plug from a concentrator when you disconnect, or it just happens when they’re hooking up a new customer and yours gets unplugged to make room. But then they turn around and charge like $50 just to come out and plug that back in for a new install. That can be the entire install, you can bring your own modem and have everything fine inside, but some yahoo charges $50 to come out and plug some coax into a concentrator in a box 20 ft from your house that they unplugged for free last week.

  • Your Huckleberry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Office Depot sells printers at very low (or even negative) margin, and then inflates the margins on cables, paper, ink, and warranty. If you want the best deal, get the printer from OD, and everything else you need somewhere else. That $20 USB cable they sell costs them $1 and you can get the same or better online for $2.68.

    • TehBamski@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know I’m super late to the party, but everyone should know about Monoprice.com

      It’s honestly my go-to website whenever I need audio cables, video cables, PC/laptop adaptors, or even network cables. But they offer a lot more than just cables.

      Let’s say you need to buy a personal printer cable (USB-A to USB-B) at’s 6 feet long. Office Depot’s lowest price is just under $6. Best Buy’s lowest price is $7.99. Staples’ lowest cost offer is a bit over $3. Walmart’s lowest price is just under $5. Amazon’s lowest price (minus Monoprice items on the site,) is just under $7. Monoprice offers one 6 foot long printer cable for $1.99. And after adding the shipping cost for me, it came out to be $5.

    • RudeGryphon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Aye this is 100% correct! I used to manage a store in NC. Also none of the tech services are actually done by the associates. We just attach a USB with a program for someone else to fix it remotely.

  • tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I worked as software engineer and my boss tolerated me going to office at 2pm and leave at 9pm. It’s against company policy, certainly, but no one talked about it. It still is my most productive and happy time.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m changing jobs at the moment. I accepted a position at a UK office of an American company which I was a perfect fit for but they wouldn’t tolerate remote working or flexitime. A few days after, I was offered a job at a UK company offering 80% remote work and very generous flexi but for £5000/year less. I let the American company know I wouldn’t be starting with them after all. Honestly, it this day and age flexible hours and such aren’t a big ask for most information workers and work-life life balance is too important.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Over a decade ago I worked as a freelancer for an Investment Bank (the largest one that went bankrupt in the 2008 Crash, which was a few years later) were the head of the Proprietary Trading Desk (the team of Traders who invest for the profit of the bank) asked me if I could change the software so that they could see the investments of the Client Trading Desk (who invest for clients with client money) was making, with the assent of the latter team.

    Now if the guys investing money for the bank know what they guys investing customer money are doing they can do things like Front-Run the customer trades (or serve them at exactly the right price to barelly beat the competiotion) thus making more profits for the bank and hence get bigger bonuses. This is why Financial regulations say that there is supposed to be so-called Chinese Walls between the proprietary trading and the customer trading activities: they’re supposed to be segregated and not visible to each other.

    Note that the heads of both teams were mates and already regularly had chats, so they might already have been exchanging this info informally.

    I was quite fresh in there (less than 1 year) and the software system I worked in at the time was used by both teams, but when I started looking into it I saw that the separation was very explicitly coded in software and that got me thinking about what I had learned from the mandatory compliance training I had done when I first joined (so, yeah, that stuff is not totally useless!!!)

    So I asked for written confirmation from the heads of both teams, and just got some vague response e-mails, no clear “do such and such”.

    So I played the fool and took it to a seperate team called Compliance (responsible for compliance with financial regulations) saying I just wanted to make sure it was all prim and proper, “just in case”.

    Of course, it kinda blew up (locally) and I ended up called to a meeting with the heads of the Prop Desk and whatnot - all stern looks and barelly contained angry tones - were I kept playing the fool.

    Ultimatelly it ended up not being a problem for me at all, to the point that after that bank went bust and its component parts were sold to another bank, the technical team manager asked me to come back to work with the same IT group (remember, I was a freelancer) with even greater responsabilities, so this didn’t exactly damage my career.

    That said, over the years there were various cases of IT guys in large investment banks who went along with “innocent” requests from the Traders and ended up as the fall-guys for subsequent breaking of Finance Regulations, serving jail time, so had I gone along with that request I would’ve actually risked ending up in jail.

    (Financial Regulators were and are a complete total joke when it comes to large banks, which actually makes it more likely that some poor techie guy will be made the fall guy to protected the bank and its heads).

    • Wats0ns@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is your friendly reminder that the only person who went to jail for the diesel gate is the software developer who implemented the test-cheating practice. Not the managers, the directors who asked for it or anybody else

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        If there’s one thing being a decade in Finance, including through the 2008 Crash, plus the pondering all about what happenned before, during and after 2008, and looking at all those situations with a much more informed eye since, is that in the present day most Regulators aren’t there for the good of citizens, they’re there for the good for A/The System, which is invariably dominated by and useful for but a tiny subset of people.

        For example, the UK’s Financial Regulator is tasked with “Maintaining the stability of the markets” and the way they interpret their mandate is such that their reaction to Market abuses by any large player is to cover it up at any cost: a thoroughly rigged Market were there most market players are not in the know is more stable than a genuinelly Free Market properly watched over to remain so and were large market players are punished if they try to rig the market.

        Whilst Finance is maybe the worst in this regard, anywhere there are large wealthy companies (often having a veritable revolving door of heads between them and the Regulator) with politically influence and deemed Economically Important (in Finance they’re called “Too Big To Fail”) the Regulator will protect them and their leaders, often by finding scapegoats, and do so even against the best interests of citizens in general.

  • zuhayr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    An AI company… They used to manually change system event logs to show it wasn’t their software that caused the downtime for our clients.

    Bought over a million dollars worth hardware (25% of which didn’t even got racked), over 200 46inch LED screens that no one used, and very expensive offices at posh locations in the bid to increase its IPO valuation.

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve always been wondering to what degree are logs accurate, or rather believable as presented.

      Such as when it comes to affiliate marketing, or ads. How can I, as a customer, know the numbers Amazon or Google about how many people used my link / seen my ad, aren’t full of shit?

    • zuhayr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Also, this unicorn that rhymes with Infinity, has all it’s database service accounts with… Drum roll… “Password1”. And most of the other secret service accounts and the passwords reside on company wide accessible Atlassian Confluence.

  • Abrslam @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I worked for for the railroad. Nothing is fixed ever. I witnessed hundreds of code violations every day for years. Doesn’t matter if a rail car or locomotive meets code as long as it “can travel” its good to go.

    When an employee inspector finds a defective rail car management determines if it will get fixed. If the supervisor “feels” like “it’s not that bad” then the rail car is “let go”.