cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/151111

With the dust is settling from their defeat on Tuesday, it’s becoming clearer that there was some incredible malpractice going on in the Democratic party. As shown in the tweet I linked, Biden delayed dropping out even though his team knew it was going to be a complete blowout for Trump. Then, we have Harris’s campaign spending over a billion dollars and still losing all of the swing states she needed to win.

For all the Democrats who would never vote Republican and would have never voted third party, are you now considering voting third party in future elections? If not, what would it take?

  • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    A truly progressive third party that also actually has a prayer of winning. They would need a groundswell of individual small donors making up much of their campaign funding because mainstream ain’t gonna fund them, so good luck with that.

    • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Despite a billion dollars in funding, the Democrats campaign didn’t have a prayer either. And I have a hard time calling their platform progressive at all. Anyone who liked it more than that of the Greens or the PSL would have just voted Republican.

        • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yes, but as it turned out, Harris didn’t have a prayer either. If you weren’t voting for Trump (I assume you consider him to be the bigger asshole) it didn’t matter if you voted for Harris or any other candidate. So unless the Democrats make big changes to their platform and the people running their campaigns… well, it’s insanity to expect a different result. There’s got to be a point where progressive Democrats decide that they might as well vote with some dignity for third party candidates.

          • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Until I have good reason to believe that my vote stands a good chance of actually mattering should I do such a thing, no. There’s no way of knowing the result beforehand, so I’d rather play it safer and spend it on trying to prevent the worst possible outcome. Might not always work, but then again it might.

            • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              In a FPTP race with a large electorate, it’s a pretty safe bet that your individual vote will not matter to the outcome. That’s not even considering the effect of the Electoral College.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              It’s the opposite though? By phrasing it this way it implies the data comes from downed fighters/bombers, aka the exact data you want to avoid that.

              • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                3 days ago

                Yup. In the context of the election, survivorship bias would be Democratic strategists looking at the Trump campaign and saying “we gotta get more racist”. Considering at their position on immigration, that’s apparently what they did.

    • dontgooglefinderscult@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      So, the green party. Good thing a bunch of far right idiots didn’t spend the last 8 years implying a licensed medical doctor at the head of the party was a Russian spy.

      • PhilipTheBucketA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        Bernie Sanders did that, and it did great. It wasn’t enough to win, partly because the Democrats fucked him.

        At this point, you’ll have to contend with massive social-media operations which are working against and shaping the narratives that most of the country use as a substitute for news, to understand what’s happening in the world. I think the time to be able to do it has passed, for a little while, without on-the-ground anti-electoral organizing on a massive scale.

        See who you can find in your area. It’s about to get real, I think.