• Butt Pirate@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Two things:

    1. Separation of Church and State is not codified into law

    And

    1. 1A specifically says “Congress shall pass no law respecting any religion”. They’ll say this law was passed by a state, not congress. Ipso facto, they rule in his favor.
    • eltrain123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The actual text concerning religion says that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;…”. It’s arguable that requiring publicly funding schools to display a specific religions moral code is establishing their religious views as a standard others must follow.

      The second part of that (prohibiting the free exercise thereof) is not affected. They are free to do whatever they want in their private homes and institutions. They just are not free to force those practices on others or other’s children. You don’t have the freedom to “exercise” if exercise means forcing your will on others. And anyone that thinks that should be the case is specifically calling to remove that constitutional freedom from our society.

      It’s un-American… by definition…

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also

      1. The current conservative SCOTUS doesn’t care about precedent or the constitution and will rule however they want.