• Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Once they start allowing exceptions to separation of church and state it also tears down the door of free speech and allows people to be prosecuted for blasphemy or whatever nonsense actual witch hunting

  • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    He wants it to go all the way to the supreme court so they can rule in his favor and further erode the separation of church and state. Fuck these assholes and this timeline…

    • Weirdmusic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Honestly, I can’t see how SCOTUS could rule in his favour. The US constitution clearly states that there is a seperation between church and state. For SCOTUS to rule in his favour would require them overturning the constitution itself.

      • Butt Pirate@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Two things:

        1. Separation of Church and State is not codified into law

        And

        1. 1A specifically says “Congress shall pass no law respecting any religion”. They’ll say this law was passed by a state, not congress. Ipso facto, they rule in his favor.
        • eltrain123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          The actual text concerning religion says that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;…”. It’s arguable that requiring publicly funding schools to display a specific religions moral code is establishing their religious views as a standard others must follow.

          The second part of that (prohibiting the free exercise thereof) is not affected. They are free to do whatever they want in their private homes and institutions. They just are not free to force those practices on others or other’s children. You don’t have the freedom to “exercise” if exercise means forcing your will on others. And anyone that thinks that should be the case is specifically calling to remove that constitutional freedom from our society.

          It’s un-American… by definition…

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Also

          1. The current conservative SCOTUS doesn’t care about precedent or the constitution and will rule however they want.
      • walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        The Constitution is just an interpretation of the teachings of the Founding Fathers. SCOTUS is the only body that has a direct line of communication to the Founding Fathers. We can rely on them to convey to the masses what the Founding Fathers truly intended.

        (I think this is sarcasm, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they used this logic)

  • Veraxus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    If this goes the way he wants, he’ll also get the Seven Tenets everywhere the Ten Commandments are.