Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week’s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    New piece from The Atlantic: The Age of AI Child Abuse is Here, which delves into a large-scale hack of Muah.AI and the large-scale problem of people using AI as a child porn generator.

    And now, another personal sidenote, because I cannot stop writing these (this one’s thankfully unrelated to the article’s main point):

    The idea that “[Insert New Tech] Is Inevitabletm” (which Unserious Academic interrogated in depth BTW) took a major blow when NFTs crashed and burned in full view of the public eye and got rapidly turned into a pop-culture punchline.

    That, I suspect, is helping to fuel the large scale rejection of AI and resistance to its implementation - Silicon Valley’s failure to make NFTs a thing has taught people that Silicon Valley can be beaten, that resistance is anything but futile.

      • swlabr@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        ok my first thought was to make a joke about castle warfare, despite my knowledge set being ephemera from a childhood appreciating tech trees in video games. So I did some research:

        • The etymology of “moat” is that it comes from the word “motte”. I will not elaborate.
        • Moats were effective against early forms of siege warfare, like battering rams, siege towers, and mining out the foundations of a castle’s defences, or anything that required approaching the castle directly
        • Moats were made somewhat obsolete by siege artillery, which did not need to be in the direct vicinity of the castle

        Err so yeah. Make your own jokes, ig.

        Anyway, this has been MoatFacts™️. Paging @skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de for better commentary*

        • istewart@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          In this context, “moat” is a cargo-cult invocation of Warren Buffett and Benjamin Graham. Just another square on the hackernews bingo

        • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          idk what to exactly put there, moat is still an obstacle even in modern context, but assault on a castle with a moat using modern weaponry would be hilariously one-sided. you can suppress defenders with something, use a bridge layer to get inside the moat, then let combat engineers do their shenanigans to “open” castle one way or another. or you can use helis to do the same, or you can just level it all with artillery or airstrike or maybe even loads of ATGMs

          that said it’s not completely useless. moats but dry were used as a part of fixed fortifications in ww1 quite successfully. freshly invented electrified barbed wire fence and machine guns made them quite hard to pass, especially if you are, say, a peasant from tula oblast born in 1898 that has never seen powerline before. i think the last proper moat use in large-scale warfare happened during iran-iraq war, in battle of the marshes, when iraqis flooded previously dry area known as fish lake and put underwater coils of barbed wire and high-voltage cables. defensive tactic used there was to shoot at assaulting iranians to make them abandon or fall out of their boats or amphibious vehicles, then when they were in the water high voltage lines were energized. iranians eventually crossed the marshes entirely using speedboats. maybe it’s not that outdated considering that last recored bayonet charge happened in 2004 (by brits in iraq). ymmv

  • o7___o7@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Me, a nuclear engineer reading about “Google restarting six nuclear power plants”

    lol, lmao even

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You know, I can’t tell if this is supposed to be “I know you’re saying that calling unhoused people vermin is some Nazi shit, but it’s more complicated than that” or “I know calling unhoused people vermin is some Nazi shit, and I’m honestly okay with that”.

      Gonna guess the latter given where it’s coming from and the fact that the actual “more complicated” is a salad of non sequiturs.

      • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The top comment’s also pretty good, especially the final paragraph:

        I guess these companies decided that strip-mining the commons was an acceptable deal because they’d soon be generating their own facts via AGI, but that hasn’t come to pass yet. Instead they’ve pissed off many of the people they were relying on to continue feeding facts and creativity into the maws of their GPUs, as well as possibly fatally crippling the concept of fair use if future court cases go against them.

  • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Molly White reports on Kamala Harris’s recent remarks about Cryptocurrency being a cool opportunity for black men.

    VP Harris’s press release (someone remind me to archive this once internet archive is up). Most of the rest of it is reasonable, but it paints cryptocurrency in a cautiously positive light.

    Supporting a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency and other digital assets so Black men who invest in and own these assets are protected

    […]

    Enabling Black men who hold digital assets to benefit from financial innovation.

    More than 20% of Black Americans own or have owned cryptocurrency assets. Vice President Harris appreciates the ways in which new technologies can broaden access to banking and financial services. She will make sure owners of and investors in digital assets benefit from a regulatory framework so that Black men and others who participate in this market are protected.

    Overall there has been a lot of cryptocurrency money in this US election on both sides of the aisle, which Molly White has also reported extensively on. I kind of hate it.

    “regulation” here is left (deliberately) vague. Regulation should start with calling out all the scammers, shutting down cryptocurrency ATMs, prohibiting noise pollution, and going from there; but we clearly don’t live in a sensible world.

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Introducing the official crypto coin of the Harris-Walz ticket: JoyCoin! Trading under JOY. Every time a coin is minted, we shoot someone from the global south in the head.

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Jesus GNU Christ, Live your life so that no one ever produces a systematic classification of your opinions that looks like this

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh I certainly did meet a lot of people employed in auth related stuff that clearly spent only 2 weeks on learning anything about OpenID and I certainly didn’t not hate their guts and wished they were replaced by a small shell script

      • blakestacey@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Fun fact: The plain vanilla physics major at MIT requires three semesters of quantum mechanics. And that’s not including the quantum topics included in the statistical physics course, or the experiments in the lab course that also depend upon it.

        Grad school is another year or so of quantum on top of that, of course.

        (MIT OpenCourseWare actually has fairly extensive coverage of all three semesters: 8.04, 8.05 and 8.06. Zwiebach was among the best lecturers in the department back in my day, too.)

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This person has certainly committed to this philosophy, even to the extent of spending less than one week of thought coming to this very conclusion.

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      the raw, mediocre teenage energy of assuming you can pick up any subject in 2 weeks because you’ve never engaged with a subject more complex than playing a video game and you self-rate your skill level as far higher than it actually is (and the sad part is, the person posting this probably isn’t a teenager, they just never grew out of their own bullshit)

      given how oddly specific “application auth protocol” is, bets on this person doing at best minor contributions to someone else’s OAuth library they insist on using everywhere? and when they’re asked to use a more appropriate auth implementation for the situation or to work on something deeper than the surface-level API, their knowledge immediately ends

        • self@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          so uh, they keep self-fellating on Twitter about how they invented their own CAD program over the objections of the haters

          here it is, it’s an extremely thin wrapper around the typescript version of manifold with live reloading on changes. note that not only is manifold already a CAD library, they already have a web-based editor that reloads the model on code changes, and kache’s live reloading is just nodemon. the server part looks like it’s barely modified from a code example. the renderer is just three.js grabbed from a CDN.

          it’s so weird they didn’t take the necessary 2 weeks to learn how to write the CAD parts of the CAD system they made!

        • self@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          the absolute worst type of coworker from my cubicle days: heard about a technology at a conference, decided they invented it

        • bitofhope@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          “O Cent O Pence (R)” is an anagram for “Necropotence”

          Trump is clearly campaigning on the critically overlooked black draw engine platform, possibly to spite blue voters.

          Edit: “One Percent Co.” was right there! It’s all coming together now!

    • gerikson@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thank for letting me know there are other people indifferent to dark mode. Sometimes I feel I am the only one.

      • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        i have already had whiny shits demand that I (a) set dark mode default (b) remove the switch

        default is currently set to whatever your browser thinks is the default and you can switch it otherwise