Kamala Harris didn’t invade Gaza, and she was in no way in charge of the US administration that aided and abetted it.

Kamala might not be invading gaza personally, but instead of taking any meaningful to stop the invasion, she is reinforcing the invasion by refusing to take actions to stop the flow of bombs that are the means of genocide.

Kamala has the ability to try and get biden to halt sending weapons, or even try and get biden to force israel to stop more directly, like what Obama did when he was in office.

She also has the ability to say that she will stop sending the weapons used to commit genocide to israel, but instead of that she refused to do so.

Just because she isn’t biden doesn’t mean she is powerless, she’s the fucking vice president.

I’m just saying that Trump will be worse for the Palestinians,

Is there anything worse that you can do besides full support of genocide while saying genocide is bad? Is it full support of genocide while being even more racist?

so for someone else who’s also on the outside to say that voting for Kamala is a bad idea is a horrifying mistake, to me.

And that brings us back to what I was saying about choosing to play a different game in my first comment.

The act of voting isn’t the problem when you take a look at non-voting. Instead, it’s the participation in the loosing game, and the implications of that.

By participating, you fight at a disadvantage. It goes without saying that there are a lot of problems with the electoral process, but things are a lot worse tan gerrymandering and voter restrictions.

Non-voting is also taking the stance that voting will not save you. If you want a better world, playing this shitty losing game will not take you there. The ends and the means are intertwined, if you play shitty games you win shitty prizes.