A Wisconsin woman accused of stabbing her classmate to please horror character Slender Man more than a decade ago asked a judge again Friday to release her from a psychiatric hospital.

Morgan Geyser, who is now 22 years old, filed a petition with Waukesha County Circuit Judge Michael Bohren seeking her release from the Winnebago Mental Health Institute. The petition marks the third time in the last two years she has asked Bohren to let her out of the facility.

She withdrew her first petition two months after filing it in 2022. Bohren denied her second request this past April, saying she remains a risk to the public.

  • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well it’s the fact that she did this as an untreated mentally ill 12 year old, and now they have a decade of treatment under their belt. The request actually contains a request to be assessed by an expert.

    The one-page petition doesn’t include any arguments for Geyser’s release. Instead, it cites state laws that require Bohren within 20 days to appoint at least one expert to examine her and produce a report within 30 days of being appointed.

    If she hasn’t been assessed there’s no reason not to assess her now that she’s requested it.

    • nepenthes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      There is a link in the article to an earlier article that covers her 1st request, in which there was an assessment:

      Judge Michael Bohren ruled against Morgan Geyser, now 21, despite the testimony of two psychiatrists, including the medical director of Winnebago Mental Health Institute, who said she was ready to depart that hospital and return to the community under certain conditions.

      • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, it’s not clear if they were the court appointed psychiatrist and if they assembled a report like the law requires. If they did, and the judge ignored it and their testimony he’s being a shitbird.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      People downvoted them, as best I can tell, for saying that being stabbed 19 times is “horrible”.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Stabbing someone 19 times is horrible, but it is immaterial a decade later in determining whether or not that person requires psychiatric care. We know why she’s in there, but the legal system is saying she should continue being there even when nurses and the director of the psych hospital all say that she doesn’t require further involuntary commitment.

        She was found Not Guilty by reason of insanity. If the psych hospital she’s been confined to for the past decade says she’s ready for supervised release, keeping her there as a punishment is flat-out unconstitutional.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          This sounds like your first injustice. In fact, people are quite commonly held back for years or decades after their sentences for stuff like this. It suck, it really does. You have to vote/get involved if you want to change it.

      • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Right, it’s obvious that it’s horrible, it’s tone deaf to harp on it when she’s been incarcerated for a decade.

          • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            No, I want to have patients assessed for release like the law requires and actually have the system do something more than abuse people.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Gonna need more that empty platitudes. Explain what you think is wrong here v which specific laws and processes are not being followed, who is responsible, and what is the remedy? Also why are you rooting for a confirmed attempted murderer? This really comes across as hero worship.

              • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                21 hours ago

                why are you rooting for a confirmed attempted murderer?

                She was found not guilty. Why do you want to punish the innocent?

                • stoly@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  Not guilty is not the same as innocent. She was not guilty due to insanity but she still committed the act.

                • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  She was found not guilty because she was twelve. Not because she didn’t attempt to murder that person.

              • Breezy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                She was fucking 12 and not mentally able, shesbeen in jail for ten years, yeah lets check her out. I swear shes been in jail longer then others and you think thats juuuuust fine right.

                  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    21 hours ago

                    You don’t know the details, but you’ll call anyone who argues against keeping this person involuntarily committed for the rest of their life an “apologist”.

                    Sounds like you just worship the U.S. “justice system”, and get off on seeing people ruined by it, regardless of what’s justified.