• qprimed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    the current reality is not the future reality - thats their sell, basically obama “hope-ishness”. personally, I think it can work to keep trump out of office. this is a generational moment and the dems have it on their side.

    so, with luck, we get to reject trump and, depending on the turnout, watch where progressives settle around.the seat of power.

    between the dems and republicans, they have whittled down progressive representation, but its still there.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      The real powerplay if Trump loses would be to pass an amendment setting a maximum age to run for president. Maybe tie it to retirement age. Old enough to receive social security, too old to run. Ideally you make that apply to all political offices, but I’m not that optimistic. Not that I think there’s a snowballs chance in hell of this actually happening as that would be a sane and sensible thing to do and therefore antithetical to everything our current crop of politicians stand for.

      • qprimed@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        dream big dreams.

        if we manage to hobble past this brush against the mirror, then cool. maybe we don’t like the monster after all.

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Whoever the candidate is, they have to avoid talking about Israel and use vague language on the issue. If they come out swinging for Israel I think it would not be a good look.

      • qprimed@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        this is where you use surrogates. signal with the surrogates and keep yourself out of the fray.

        we will learn a lot by who is doing the most interesting talking on behalf of the campaign.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        No messaging or surrogate can have a good answer to “why haven’t you already done it?”

        If instead of vaguely suggesting there might be a ceasefire sometime in the future if the dems remain in power, they stopped all arms shipments to Israel and sanctioned them until all Palestinians are granted equal political rights and right-to-return, you wouldn’t be asking yourself “How do I dress up support for an ongoing genocide”, you’d be telling people “We ended apartheid”

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      thats their sell, basically obama “hope-ishness”

      That works when you’ve had 8 years of Bush and are campaigning on free healthcare, ending the wars, federal legalization of cannabis. It works when you’ve had 4 years of Trump and everyone thinks the democrats will defund the police, provide free healthcare and college, abolish ICE, codify roe, pack the court, etc. Then when you fail to do any of that, you get the shit kicked out of you 2 years later.

      The dems cannot campaign on hope when they’ve demonstrated that they will not give the people what they want.

      This isn’t a messaging problem, it’s a “triangulating yourself to be 2 inches left of republicans and then acting surprised when your base doesn’t show up” for 30+ years problem.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        How much of that was blocked in some way by the reps? Every time the peanut gallery chimes in with “what did Dems ever get accomplished?” they never provide the required addendum that reps are obstructionists.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          They had the house and senate in 2020. We’ve seen how effectively the dems can whip a vote to call a progressive an antisemite, so think of how much easier it would be to do something that every dem’s constituency wants done.

          But there’s plenty of ways to get around congress, we have one of the most powerful executives in the world.

          Don’t like ICE? You choose it’s head. Appoint someone who will fire every officer and sell off/destroy the assets.

          Don’t like overturning roe? Open up military hospitals to provide contraceptive care to civilians. Withdraw federal support from states that ban abortion and if the SCOTUS doesn’t like it, tell them to enforce it.

          We’ve seen Biden go around congress, but it was to send even more arms to Israel faster.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        many of biden’s appointees such as his NLRB pick are better than the last 3 democrats.

      • qprimed@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        agreed. the Democrats have been abusive. cant really do anything about that until we have a better nomination, funding and voting system.

        trump is a time dilation machine. the closer we get to him the shorter my horizon gets. keeping him away from the near dictatorial powers the supreme court just sanctioned is my primary objective.

        I (and perhaps you) and many others should remember that the age we grew in defined us. the younger see things a little differently

        I am just tryng to make enough space between the ancient vampires and our kids to allow them to have a say in their future.