Then provide some reliable sources and prove me wrong. Podcasts are shit and the two of them are sisters, which makes it one source. I found an article talking about their fashion brand and some of their “persecution” and it’s a load of nonsense which doesn’t fall within the realm of genocide.
What happened was they embellished some vague childhood memories in order to boost their brand.
that’s where the names are from.
those are the people being interviewed.
That’s why they used their names.
A single shit podcast and two names and that’s all you have to show as evidence for genocide?
nope, none of your comment seems correct.
Then provide some reliable sources and prove me wrong. Podcasts are shit and the two of them are sisters, which makes it one source. I found an article talking about their fashion brand and some of their “persecution” and it’s a load of nonsense which doesn’t fall within the realm of genocide.
What happened was they embellished some vague childhood memories in order to boost their brand.
your opinion of podcasts doesn’t make firsthand sources unreliable.
'boost their brand"
the uyghurs?
The sisters. Did you not even look up the people you cited as your basis for accusations of genocide?
ohhh, so you’re pretending…it’s like a straw man thing you’re trying for?
okay, I’ll bite. what is your argument for uyghur genocide and how are you defining genocide?
There is no Uyghur Genocide either cultural or ethnic.
You’re a deeply unserious person and I’m starting to think you’re getting off to this, you dirty little masochist.
by providing facts and sources? weird conclusion.
a bunch of people are asking me questions. I’m providing clear answers.
Seems correct to me.