• muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    They cant their parents can tho. Puberty blockers are not a life saving treatment they are physical only and thus just like plastic surgery shouldnt be given to kids. And no u cant argue they will kill themselves if they dont get treated there is plenty of peer reviewed papers proving that to be false.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        People like this are so ridiculous. They really don’t understand the concept of not being comfortable in your own body to the point that you don’t even want to live because your family and society in general disapprove of you being who you really are.

        Which is ridiculous because I’m cis and it’s not hard for me at all to understand that being given gender-affirming care would be pretty fucking helpful for kids who feel that way.

        Or rather either they don’t understand it or they don’t care because it’s “wrong.”

      • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        Now thats a bad faith argument. I usually get banned for calling people an idiot or is that only cos my opinions are controversial?

        • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m not arguing with you. Your opinion is just wrong and irrelevant. Not understanding a medical treatment and wanting it banned because it makes you uncomfortable makes you a small minded, bad person. I hope you take the time to either reevaluate your life or go away.

            • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              3 months ago

              How was this banned for rule 1 and the comment i was replying to not. I called the guy a lier cos he said he didnt want an argumwnt while callibg me a small minded bad person. Can someone please explain how this not unequal application of rules.

        • webadict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, a bad faith argument would be using one study and a handful of doctors that aren’t specialists in the area that agrees with you versus the hundreds of studies and thousands of doctors that specialize in the area that don’t.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            His paper doesn’t even say what he wants it to say. It’s a super narrow finding that psychological care is still required along with blockers.

          • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            As it stands im the only one who has provided any peer reviewed papers to back my point. Said study alsi happens to be a meta review so it reviews all the other papers and assesses them.

            • webadict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              Also, no, it looked at 9 specific studies, not “all” studies. It’s conclusions are basically “We need more studies.”

            • webadict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              I looked at your study, but all it showed was that there were no statistically significant side effects for puberty blockers, so what’s the problem?