Tell me you don’t understand how generative AI works.
As long as progress continues and humanity survives, computer generated art will eventually outperform humans. It’s pretty obvious, as far as science knows you could just simulate a full human consciousness and pull images out of that somehow, but able to run that in parallel, never deteriorating, never tiring. It’s not a matter of if “AI” can outperform humans, it’s a matter of if humanity will survive to see that and how long it might take.
Tell me you don’t understand how generative AI works.
Current generation generative AI is mapping patterns in images to tokens in text description, creating a model that reproduces those patterns given different combinations of input tokens. I don’t know the finer details of how the actual models are structured… But it doesn’t really matter, because if human brains can create something, there’s nothing stopping a sufficiently advanced computer and program from recreating the same process.
We’re not there, not by a long shot, but if we continue developing more computational power, it seems inevitable that we will reach that point one day.
Tell me you don’t understand how generative AI works.
That did it!
Current generation generative AI is mapping patterns in images to tokens in text description, creating a model that reproduces those patterns given different combinations of input tokens. I don’t know the finer details of how the actual models are structured… But it doesn’t really matter, because if human brains can create something, there’s nothing stopping a sufficiently advanced computer and program from recreating the same process.
We’re not there, not by a long shot, but if we continue developing more computational power, it seems inevitable that we will reach that point one day.