![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/erAmEMR31m.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
Yes, they shouldn’t because they have no evidence and are therefore arrogantly asserting something they have no reason to believe
I’m an anarchocommunist, all states are evil.
Your local herpetology guy.
Feel free to AMA about picking a pet/reptiles in general, I have a lot of recommendations for that!
Yes, they shouldn’t because they have no evidence and are therefore arrogantly asserting something they have no reason to believe
I never denied the possibility, I denied we should believe in those things
it sounds incredibly arrogant to me to assume you know something without evidence
No neither do astrophysicists, they think it might be true with healthy skepticism
or they have proven it true with observation, neither of which applies to religion
are you confident you’re not the arrogant one?
be·lief noun
“his belief in the value of hard work”
\2. trust, faith, or confidence in someone or something.
“I’ve still got belief in myself”
I don’t believe in anything without evidence and if I do I seek to correct that
belief without evidence is a failure of the mind
i don’t assume the vast majority of astrophysics is true
neither do astrophysicists
Evidence exists for astrophysics
I do not, why would I?
nobody asserts that, they assert that we don’t know, which is accurate it is religion that asserts it happened through magic
I do understand that it is something people made up without any evidence.
I am this arrogant about anything without evidence, if you present evidence, then I have a reason to believe.
All religion is untested made up nonsense, no exceptions.
If you make it up without evidence, it can be thrown out without evidence. Athiests make no claims, there’s nothing to throw out.
The real answer to these questions is “we have no idea”, everything else falls under russel’s teapot.
I desperately want to know what he thinks his worst idea is