• Natanael@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    No, because the best art isn’t measured in skill, but in relevance to lived experiences

    Until you can upload a bunch of brains and simulate them in full you can’t capture that experience accurately, and you’ll still have a hard time keeping it up to date

    • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, he’s got a point. AI already scores, on average, at least 8.7 kilo-arts on the quantitative art scale we all use already (and have, ever since the Renaissance gave us all that pesky realism), and line always go up, as we know.

      Not sure if I need the /s but here it is.