The legislation, which states that “protections for access to abortion rights … should be supported," was blocked by Republicans who panned it as a “show vote.”

Senate Republicans on Wednesday blocked legislation led by Democrats to revive the protections of Roe v. Wade in the wake of the Supreme Court eliminating the nationwide right to abortion.

The vote was 49-44, falling short of the super-majority needed to defeat a filibuster due to broad opposition from Republicans, who dismissed it as a political stunt.

The Reproductive Freedom for Women Act, introduced last month around the second anniversary of the court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, is just a few sentences long. It states that “protections for access to abortion rights and other reproductive health care” after the 2022 ruling “should be supported.” It adds that “the protections enshrined in* Roe v. Wade …* should be restored and built upon, moving towards a future where there is reproductive freedom for all.”

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The only way that makes since is if you think AOC, Joe Manchin, Joe Biden, and every other politician that caucuses with the Dem party are on the same page and working for the same shit…

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      The only way that makes since is if you think AOC, Joe Manchin, Joe Biden, and every other politician that caucuses with the Dem party are on the same page and working for the same shit…

      Not at all, the lack of party unity is one of the reasons they have done a suboptimal job with this and other things. Nonetheless, the flowchart is true, and you can see it over and over when any major thing happens. 100% of the time? No. Is it very often relevant to folks removed about Dems? Yes, IMO it is. But with absolute sincerity, you are welcome to disagree.

    • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      had half a century to codify Roe v. Wade and on that note Biden was not helpful in keeping Clarence Thomas out of the Supreme Court

      Biden’s political career consisted of crime bills, protecting heterosexual marriage, and being a war supporter

      he only changed step in the last decade or so just to be more voteable and with Harris as a VP does not show much change

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m sorry for the multiple replies - I just keep remembering one more thing.

        had half a century to codify Roe v. Wade

        In this case I’m going to steal these comments from one I had saved a month ago, penned by @MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world :

        Since 1981 Democrats have had control of the Presidency and Congress a whopping 4 years. One 2 year period under Clinton and one under Obama. That’s without factoring in the ability to fillibuster in the Senate. In over 40 years they’ve only had control 10% of the time.

        and

        That period of filibuster-proof control during Obama’s term is why we have the ACA. It was ~70 days and they passed the largest healthcare overhaul in generations.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          And that control under Obama included senator Joe Donnelly, who was anti-abortion (the only way he could get elected in Indiana).

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        You know that almost no one actually likes Biden as a choice right? And I absolutely don’t like Harris - I think she’ll pull us further to the right than Biden would. He’s just a better choice than the Evil Incarnate party. (and so is she) So when you folks come along to smear him like this, it falls a little flat.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Biden was not helpful in keeping Clarence Thomas out of the Supreme Court

        “Not helpful” is cutting him a lot of slack…

        He was the chair for the Anita Hill hearings and refused to let other victims testify in addition to a whole bunch of other shit

        When Biden talks about “good ole days” of being friends with Republicans, he’s talking about how much they liked him when he was helping get Clarence on the court for life.