Original post

This action was taken under an unannounced rule that can label and censor criticism of anyone or anything with “FUD.”

You’ll find it’s only used to protect the rich and powerful, though.

Unable to simply delete the post, the moderators scrubbed comments from anyone who named and shamed CEO James Dolan, but allowed his supporters to remain uncensored.

James Dolan is a thin-skinned billionaire crybaby who runs Madison Square Garden like it’s his own little surveillance state. The fact that he's using facial recognition tech to ban people—not for crimes, not for safety concerns—but for criticizing him is some straight-up dictator energy.........This isn’t just petty. It’s dangerous. It’s the kind of fascist-lite garbage we’ve been warning about for years: once the powerful get their hands on surveillance tools, they will abuse them to silence dissent. Dolan just doesn't care who sees it. He’s too arrogant, too insecure, and too rich to be held accountable.

The madison square garden ceo, james dolan, is the biggest thin-skinned pussy I have ever read about. Someone who band an individual due to a critical remark they made and put on a shirt? Pathetic lol.

Criticism of basically anyone rich or powerful was removed.

Criticism of Tucker Carlson was removed.

  • PhilipTheBucketA
    4·
    8 days ago

    I feel like maybe with a blog post or something. Or just a post with a detailed laundry list of all the least defensible decisions. I think just having particular political attitudes are (in most cases) fine… but the stuff like this that I have observed on Lemmy, and most of the stuff you’ve been talking about, there’s simply no reasonable reason for. I feel like Reddit is sufficiently anonymous-because-of-bigness and sufficiently corrupted that they get sloppier with it over there.

    I want to say it would be a good idea to reach out to carrotcypher and get their take on some of this stuff, too. It’s proper due diligence even though something about it makes me not like the idea.