• LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wait, so fancy roman homes had like knick knack shops and shit built in the front of them?

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Mixed use zoning.

      Reject Modernity: Abandon your home in an isolated residential development/neighborhood.

      Return to Tradition: Embrace functional urbanism.

      • LordGimp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ohhhhh you’re talking fantasy like TV shows where characters have apartments right above/very close to useful social centers, like bars or restaurants.

        Cool to think upper class was like sitcom living for Roman’s.

        • Cobrachicken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Aaaaand: Having a kitchen was considered upper class, eating out was for the lowers, if I remember correctly.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Correct, though with the addendum that having a kitchen pretty invariably also meant having a chef (or at least a dual-use servant-chef), and that the rich were constantly eating at each other’s houses and critiquing each other’s food.

          • LordGimp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            The Sparticus TV show I liked did NOT imply eating out was for lower classes.

            Frfr

            /horny

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep! There was a social aspect to this - client-patron relationships were very prominent in Rome; as such, those shop fronts were often rented out to one’s clients, rather than just the highest bidder. Depending on individual wealth, prominence, personal inclination, etc, this could be as distant and impersonal as one’s political supporters (“Vote for me, filthy poor, and I’ll let you in on prestigious opportunities”), or as close as an aristocrat’s family friend (“Dear Gaius’s grandfather saved my grandfather back in The Day, he’s a good fellow and we try to help him”).

  • Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Did the Romans have doors? Or did they use curtains or something similar? What was more common?

    I see several curtains in the picture but I’m not sure if there’s a door somewhere.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s also worth mentioning that the climate where these were built was, how they say in the real-estate business as, really fucking nice. They had doors, but walking through an open-air courtyard to get between rooms was hardly an inconvenience for interior comfort. I think doors were really just for privacy and maybe some rudimentary security at the front entrance.