• Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      “where are you going to go, our competitors? manic laughter

      I would suggest an mvno but they are being eaten alive too so

  • fpslem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I had one of these plans for over a decade. It was fun while it lasted—I won’t be staying with the company after this.

    • Gingerlegs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      We had the “framily” plan from way back. They did the same to us in 2020. Eventually, you could not update your device without upgrading your plan.

      We all bailed, lol

      Edit: Almost forgot! I had call them 3 (three!!!) times to finally get the service cancelled. By no accident, I’m sure. And they still left me with the 3 month bill.

      • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why not just buy the device from the manufacturer, swap the sim, and boom you’re “upgraded”.

        It blows my mind how people think ‘carrier store’ = ‘cell phone store’ and it’s the only place to get them. Friends and family were baffled by this new information when I had this discussion with them. Imagine thinking that the only place you can buy a vehicle is at [your insurance company’s local office]. All the carrier is doing is offering the service, and they sell phones too for convenience (and to lock in customers but shhh).

        • Gingerlegs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Not everyone has the luxury of spending $1200 cash on a phone outright. Unfortunately, the payment plan is a big factor for a lot of people (in a “family” plan.)

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    fiduciary duty requires that directors of corporations protect the interests of shareholders’ investments—including maximizing profits where reasonable and within the bounds of the law.

    even if technically illegal on paper (which i’m not sure it is), so long as there is no enforcement or accountability, t-mobile and similar entities have literally no reason do do better. they are literally just holding up their end of the law.

    in other words, this unfair treatment isn’t just one of many unfortunate flukes. it is literally baked into the system as a requirement.