• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m guessing the author of the article didn’t get to choose where the ad went in, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the ad was inserted automatically without anyone reviewing what went there.

    That’s not about the state of journalism, that’s about what companies are willing to let advertisers get away with.

    There are many reasons to criticize what is going on in American journalism, but this is not a very good one.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Journalism is more than just journalists recording information. It’s also about spreading that information. It being automatic doesn’t make it any less shameful, if anything far moreso, and especially bad that they use the same font and size as the rest of the page.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        But that doesn’t reflect on the content of the story itself. Shouldn’t that be what really matters?

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          No, I didn’t get to read just the story by itself. The story itself was published in a format that was unnacceptable, imo. This is a symptom of the disease plaguing the modern world, automated and profit-first systems pushing and begging for another moment of our attention at the cost of composure and ethics.

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              I’m criticizing Journalism. Period. This is a part of journalism, how they format and ship content is a huge part of journalism.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                Not according to any dictionary I’ve ever seen.

                That’s like saying newspaper classified ads are journalism.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    The ad part? No.

                    Hence it saying “writing for newspapers” not just newspapers.

                    Again, based on your claim, classified ads are journalism. Absolutely no one but you would even suggest such nonsense.