• itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Probably has something to do with retirement funds. If you have been paying into the system for 30+ years you need that money when you retire and don’t want to see it wiped out or reduced if you are fired.

      Being principled in government jobs has a high cost.

    • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s generally referred to as “a principled stance.” The same result will happen either way; this way, you get to tell your kids you made the right choice.

      • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        to me, the more principled stance would be to stay and resist until they are forced to fire you, which makes them look bad. I would have no qualms about telling my kids I made the right choice in that scenario. But others have pointed out that doing this might lead to a career civil servant losing their retirement benefits, and I can understand that that is a lot to throw away for resistance actions that will ultimately change very little.

    • millie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      … One could say the same of participation in the electoral process. Taking your ball and going home doesn’t work any better as a voter than as an official.

      • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        i don’t really agree that “one could say the same” because these are totally different situations. A voter is not a civil servant. A voter does not get paid to vote. Most voters did not swear an oath to defend the constitution (unless they are a naturalized citizen). A single voter also has no power to block an insurgent force from taking over key government systems, unlike a civil servant.

        • King_Bob_IV@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Also a voters pay and retirement benefits are not likely to be impacted by how they vote. Civil service it can make a huge difference in the long run if you retire vs get dismissed.

        • jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          A single voter has(had) the power to join other single voters.
          Most civil servants have little power against an AR.

          • elfpie@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Is this being dismissive? You presented your point of view and they presented theirs. A nice exchange. You don’t have to agree and you don’t have to answer, but this end felt like an eye roll.

  • Radioactive Butthole@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Jesus fuckin christ. Quitting still gets them what they want. Force them to fire you and be an obstructionist little shit the whole way out.

    • King_Bob_IV@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      As much as that is a wonderful sentiment. Retirement vs firing might make a substantial difference in their quality of life i. Retirement whereas getting fired is a symbolic gesture that may or may not have any impact at all. I can understand trying to make sure that personally you come out as on as possible.