Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called for the creation of a unified European military force, saying the continent must be self-reliant amid a persistent threat from Russia and uncertainty about U.S. support – a situation he described as “this new reality.”

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    NATO is effectively dead. Artifle 5 wont be honored by America. And the Alliance has trojan horses in it like Hungary under Fidesz.

    Time for a new alliance.

    Im writing tihs with the expectation that in my lifetime, the US is going to attack my country (Canada). The silence has been deafening on the American Jingoistic / imperialist talk in regards to us.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      And please, this time make it possible to eject someone in peacetime with a 3/4 or 2/3 vote.

      We’ll see what happens. Unfortunately the Europeans don’t have the same cultural affinity as we do and seem a bit behind on understanding the situation.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t know about that. What if Poland goes right wing Russian for a single election. Gets ejected. Russia invades Poland. Then what? If you are then going to protect them, there was no point to the ejection.

        IMO it needs to be a permanent union to be strong. Like the United States after the Civil War.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          If you are then going to protect them, there was no point to the ejection.

          The point would be they can’t vote on things during that period, and you have the option not to defend them. As it is, with no ejection mechanisms, we’re seriously talking about NATO invading itself now.

          IMO it needs to be a permanent union to be strong. Like the United States after the Civil War.

          It’s funny choice of example in light of the US being the problem here. That being said, it was after that point a country and not a supranational organisation. They had a federal government with direct elections, and when states got out of line they could and did federalise the local national guard.

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    What an idea, a military coalition to deter Russia from its worst impulses. I’m surprised nobody thought of this 75 years ago.

  • Foni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    We need three things to build real military power in Europe.

    1. France must put its nuclear capabilities at the service of the whole.
    2. France must put its permanent seat at the UN at the service of the whole
    3. The whole must create a power that is sufficiently centralised and at the same time representative of the European people and their interests.

    If you see this as viable, this option is viable. I choose to believe that all of this is an opportunity to make it happen.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 days ago

      Id say that the UK also needs to remove their heads from their asses and realise that they are part of Europe and act accordingly. Their ego over their past empire is poisoning them slowly. They are too powerful for Europe to not have but too weak to truly stand on their own.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        As an Englishman, I’m still cursing the puppets who voted leave. It was mostly based on lies and half truths. A lot of us want back in to Europe. We just need to figure out how to clean house and make sure people understand what we are (re)gaining.

        In the world that’s coming, we need to stand as a united front.

      • Foni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        United Kingdom does not want to be part of the EU, and obviously we will not force them, if one day they change their minds they will be welcome but in the meantime the others cannot continue waiting and we must move now, now, without delay

        • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Brexit was the product of russian disinformation and social engineering. The margin was laughably small and Scotland was 60% in favour of remaining (anti immigration propaganda didn’t address the massive numbers of English people already in Scotland). Most people in England would vote to rejoin at this point though.

          • Foni@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ok, I am delighted to hear that, vote the rejoin, in EU we will be happy to negotiate adhesion, but it does not seem something that can be resolved in weeks and the military union should occur in that type of deadline

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Brexit was caused by British exceptionalism. The people who wanted to leave wanted to leave because they thought UK is so great that it could bend the EU. People who didn’t want to leave did so because they believed UK already had a good deal with the EU (and they did) because the UK is so great. Polling data backs that up because if you start asking about making “concessions” to rejoin the EU that “Yes” to rejoin turns into “I’d rather not”.

            Polling data from a year ago


            REFV2. If tomorrow there were another referendum on EU membership, how do you think you would vote?

            • Stay out of the EU - 39%
            • Rejoin the EU - 61%

            EURO. Would the requirement to adopt the Euro as currency change your decision to rejoin the EU if you would vote to rejoin?

            • I would still want the UK to rejoin the EU if adopting the Euro was a requirement - 35%
            • I would not want the UK to rejoin the EU if adopting the Euro was a requirement - 9%
            • I would only want to rejoin the EU if we were able to keep Sterling as our currency - 14%
            • Would vote to stay out - 39%
    • Miaou@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago
      1. goes against anti proliferation treaties, and 2., while desirable, is not directly related to the matter at hand.

      Some people would rather bow to fucking USA administration than spend tax dollars (or euros) on military. Are you German by any chance?

      • Foni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago
        1. The treaty recognizes France as a nuclear power, a European army with France inside could easily argue as “heir” of that right.
        2. A first -order power, with true military intervention capacity in a global way, has to be able to block decisions at the UN, another thing is to remain in second. That is matter in hand, play with the elderly
  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yes yes yes and yes.

    We should also have boots on the ground in Ukraine IMO. This madness must stop and it’s not the american clowns that ate going to do it. Next step for them will be to lift the sanctions.

    • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      You can already go there and join their foreign legion, actually it’s been 3 years for you to have your boots on the ground. The fact that you are here and not there means you and those upvoting you want someone else to die for your militaristic fantasies while you chill in the comments.

  • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think it would be best to go to a world before 2014 and stop the occupation of Crimea. That would stop all parasites like Putin to get any ideas.

    So build a time machine.

    Or a big f. army.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Probably going to need a Eurasian army to take on Oceania and Eastasia.

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Donald Trump is going to see this as a direct threat to national security and will preemptively attack the netherlands

    • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      NATO is mainly a tool of US power projection in Europe cosplaying as a defensive alliance against Russia.

      Now with a Russian puppet sitting in the White House another time (and possibly for good), this concept isn’t worth the paper the North Atlantic Treaty is written on.

      • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        How would you implement a defensive alliance against russia without say US troops in the Baltic nations?

        • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          By the fucking EU getting its shit together. But unfortunately, the EU is infiltrated by a bunch of corrupt “transatlanticist” US bootlickers, who have been stalling the EU becoming a power that could hold its own without the US.

            • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              They, at least so far, haven’t had as much power as the US asslickers, except in a handful of countries. Also they have been generally understood as being a problem, while the US bootlickers have been largely applauded and celebrated.

    • Catman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It just a nice way of saying we should distance from US.
      A trick for politicians to talk about it trough media and countries without talking about US, like who else think this…. It would be Germany and France that would have to be the prime drive so is really for political persons there.
      I’m from Denmark so really to small to do anything, but I think we would be ready to take quite a big step away from US towards Germany. The negative impact of the last few weeks are hard to explain but I think we lost trust in the US as a people not just a few persons.

        • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Oh. We dont. We’re about 10 years past expecting Americans to do anything other than burn and destroy out of spite

          The US as a whole country doesn’t make sense, It shouldnt exist as one nation, its obvious collectively that they hate the world, and they hate each other. The only reason for its existence is to countrer the Monolith of China. and with the US stabbing its supposed allies in the back, using Jingoistic, and Imperialist talk. China is looking like the stable and sensible option now.

          This is what happens when you dont kill the Nazis. the fucking CCP becomes the more appealing option.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            China seems to be reasonable, which is what you want with a partner. Obviously they are not an ally to anyone in the west, but they act in a predictable way. Seems refreshing these days.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Poland needs to give Germany a couple of kicks in the arse, “go, rearm, no we don’t mind you having a strong military we mind you not having one let’s go kick Russian asses”. France has been anti-atlanticist for basically ever, they’re the ones constantly pushing for European strategic autonomy. I believe in Poland. They’re Slavs, they can get a rusty motor running.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sounds good but it will ultimately turn into another U.N or NATO that doesn’t actually do anything, just eats up money while they argue and veto and nothing happens

  • missandry351@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Nooooo it should be the other way around!!! Dissolve armed forces because we don’t have wars anymore!!!