The key problem is that copyright infringement by a private individual is regarded by the court as something so serious that it negates the right to privacy. It’s a sign of the twisted values that copyright has succeeded on imposing on many legal systems. It equates the mere copying of a digital file with serious crimes that merit a prison sentence, an evident absurdity.

This is a good example of how copyright’s continuing obsession with ownership and control of digital material is warping the entire legal system in the EU. What was supposed to be simply a fair way of rewarding creators has resulted in a monstrous system of routine government surveillance carried out on hundreds of millions of innocent people just in case they copy a digital file.

  • IllNess@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is so stupid since several thousand devices can use one IP address. NAT exists.

    If I download music in a Starbucks, can they fine the Starbucks CEO then?

    Anyway I hope I hope online artists, and authors are able to use this to sue AI companies for stealing their copyrighted works.

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If I download music in a Starbucks, can they fine the Starbucks CEO then?

      This sounds like the kind of grassroots activity I might be interested in.

    • QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      A good question… I suggest we all start torrenting new release movies and video games exclusively through Starbucks, because I want to know