• 9 Posts
  • 140 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023







  • True enough but I feel like English has more quirks than other languages though I acknowledge that may be bias.

    I used to have near fluent Irish way back when and I don’t recall any shenanigans like this (again I acknowledge I may not have been presented with them). I feel like most other languages have a more clearly defined set of pronunciation rules too.

    Irish looks horrific (Siobhán is shiv-awn for example) but very very closely follows pronunciation rules so that pronunciation would be no surprise to a native reading it for the first time. English sure as fuck does not follow rules like that.

    Near. Neat. Book. Boot. Etc.

    (Some small subset of Irish folks do say “boo-k” though)


  • khannie@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldI hate that that happens
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Perhaps. Regardless it’s outlandish abuse of the tongue IMO and definitely would benefit from the comma because nobody’s going to just bang out 4 had’s in a row in speech without a pause without a justifiable slap across the chops and possibly a challenge to a duel.

    “But your honour, he said ‘had’ four times on the trot without pause”

    “Case dismissed”







  • You can make nearly all images small enough to upload and still look good without dropping colour depth. There are 3 ways to achieve it basically:

    • Resize it to a lower resolution (1280 x whatever looks just fine on a screen)
    • Reduce the quality
    • Change to lossy (JPG) from non-lossy (PNG)

    The resizing is usually enough.

    The quality reduction is something that google pagespeed focuses on too. For most apps that means choosing a lower “quality” when converting to jpg or saving as a new jpg. 85% of original is good.

    If you happen to have imagemagick installed, I have a little script that I use called “resize_to_pagespeed.sh”. The jist of it is this:

    convert inputfile.jpg -filter Lanczos -resize 1280x1280 -sampling-factor 4:2:0 -strip -quality 85 outputfile.jpg

    I just ran this on a 2.4MB photo (below) and it came out at 186KB. That’s a 13x reduction. Right click -> open in new tab to see it full size.

    If the image isn’t square, imagemagick is smart enough to figure out correct dimensions.







  • No we recycled them and recycle rates were really high. They just went in the green wheelie bin and were picked up every week or two.

    I would be fine with the deposit scheme but the plastic bottles and aluminium cans all need to be in perfect condition / no squashing them down so they quickly start taking up a lot of space in our (busy) house then need a trip to the store followed by putting them in a scanning machine one by one where before we could just squish them and pop them in the green bin.

    I’m not doing any more recycling but now I have a lot more effort unfortunately.

    Also no glass in the scheme.

    I’m honestly not a fan as someone who was recycling everything already.