• PhilipTheBucketA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Any time I start to see how some politician “has been criticized” and it’s getting blown up into a big deal in the press, I assume that someone’s out to get them, and they’re probably doing a good job at pissing off the right people with how they conduct themselves.

    You can write an analysis of whether or not it’s a good idea for Macron to be in charge. That question, I have no idea the answer to. But this type of “everyone thinks he’s an asshole” middle school peer pressure stuff I am a lot more suspicious of.

    https://dnyuz.com/2024/12/21/we-can-bury-anyone-inside-a-hollywood-smear-machine/

    • inlandempire@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Granting a politician legitimacy based on criticism received is quite a dangerous way of thinking imo

    • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Except this isn’t “everyone thinks he’s an asshole”, it’s specific examples that are honestly pretty believable if you’re paying any type of attention.

      • PhilipTheBucketA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        What I’m saying is that “he said this thing that got people offended” isn’t really a good way to evaluate a politician, even if the thing he said really was offensive. There are lots of actions you can use to evaluate them instead.