- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
In a piece critical of Democratic Party support for Cuomo, the Atlantic‘s David Graham (3/3/25) wrote, “If, in order to curb the far left, Democrats like [Rep. Ritchie] Torres are willing to embrace an alleged sex pest who tried to cover up seniors’ deaths, is it worth it?”
The same might be asked of some in the corporate media, with the New York Times at the top of the list.
Some things to note:
Agreed, it’s a touch exclusionary and elitist for FAIR to critique the NY Times while providing only paywalled links to what they’re critiquing. Any NY Times article (except articles heavy on moving graphics) can be accessed via archive.ph. FAIR should say so.
My opinion is, Cuomo’s awful and FAIR has been doing good work for almost 40 years. It’s good work I don’t closely follow, though. I already understand that the media has its dumbshit and often bullshit preconceptions, and FAIR’s mission is making sure people re- and re-understanding that, but understanding it again and again doesn’t help me further.
Yeah. Generally speaking I really like FAIR. They’ve been criticizing the mainstream media for being blindly pro-Israeli-terrorism since before the phrase “mainstream media” existed. I’m not super up to speed on NY politics but presumably supporting a sexual predator for any government office is to be avoided. I don’t support either the NYT or Cuomo.
Just, anyone who is aiming any amount of pearl clutching about how the least fascist candidate in any given election is “problematic” and we need to look really closely at and get upset about their flaws repetitively, every few days, raises a few alarm bells with me.