• PhilipTheBucketOPA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t know the word any more than you do, but a lot of catastrophes in previously-comfortable societies were enabled by a large amount of indifference by the people who if they’d been spurred to action would have been able to stop it.

    Solzhenitsyn said that so many times, in the Gulag, he played it over in his head what he and people he knew should have done to resist, but they didn’t do much of anything.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      You are right of course, so what I say next is on top of rather than instead of that: those people could easily be said to include you and me. Like Bernie Sanders, who devoted his entire long life to fighting this… did he do “enough”? Is AOC doing “enough”, by “merely talking”? Obviously Luigi tried, but it didn’t work so was it “enough”?

      It’s so easy to get caught up in what others should or should not have done. What agonizes me these last few days, keeping me up at night, is what I should be doing. Which is not so simple as simply “fight back”. If someone is both robbing a home and that house is also on fire, it is not enough to stop the one - you must also stop the other. So like, I’m no climate change researcher, but I can only imagine the hard choices they must face: “should I play along, and try to do something about the climate, or… just resign, or what?” People that do aid work, if they are somehow still there, should they continue to do aid work, bc it helps people who more desperately need it? What about people working inside the system - like tax season is coming up, should they quit or sabotage things so that people don’t receive their refunds or what?

      Okay so none of this is truly “sleepwalking”, but it could look like that, from the outside? Someone making their own determination about whether they did “enough” is one thing - and ofc it’s never going to be enough - but I could easily see someone labeling what someone else as done as not being “enough”, and it’s a slippery slope from there to McCarthyism.

      Maybe - probably - I’m not helping here, bc there legit are people who not only are “sleepwalking” but I have actual family members and friends who are outright cheering it on. And no amount of quibbling over whether something is enough is going to compare to actually rooting and even asking for it to happen.

      So to me, “sleepwalking” seems both to not go nearly far enough, and also to potentially go too far (in practice if not in theory), and in general it just seems not all that helpful to me to understand things.

      As compared to watching such material as e.g. https://youtu.be/uqsBx58GxYY. Which ironically could lead to a charge of sleepwalking itself, bc staring intently into something as it happens is merely another way to excuse oneself from actually doing anything at all about it.

      • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        What am I doing? Attempting to Bee a bulwark against fascist bullshit. That’s functionally what can be done. I can’t exactly walk into the White House. The Fourth Estate has failed, so that’s no longer an option.

        Pay attention to those in your community and help where possible. As Scotty said, “it gets bumpy from here.”

      • PhilipTheBucketOPA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        those people could easily be said to include you and me

        IDK about you, but it definitely includes me. Like you, I don’t really know what to do.

        I went to a protest. I talk about it online. Mostly it’s just watching it all burning, though. I feel like I need to be doing way more.

        There’s this:

        https://events.pol-rev.com/

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          We may soon be past the point where protests will have much effect. But not yet - most of what I’m saying is more for the future, while for now protests are absolutely helping:-).

          • PhilipTheBucketOPA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I mean all kinds of things can have an effect. A lot of totalitarian regimes were overthrown starting from a way worse position than “Trump and Musk are in the White House and a lot of people are doing what they say.” But also, the US is sleeping right now, and a lot of what it takes is just a shitload of people to be on your side. Right now they are not.

            Of course that can change.

            • OpenStars@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              That’s the thing: what is happening right now, is doing so at the behest of We The People - who shouldn’t be wanting it to happen, but nevertheless, they DO.

              I heard that Nixon’s impeachment was similar. Before it happened people absolutely refused to believe it. Then when all the stuff came out, they were shocked, but they believed what the news media has said.

              Since that time, the game has changed… people heard the facts about Trump, and refused to believe it or refused to care if they did. So long as the libs are sufficiently PWNed, it doesn’t matter what else happens: we will continue to shoot ourselves in (previously) vital organs, just for spite.

              Exactly as the people funding conservative media sources seem to want to happen…