I’m only referring to data privacy laws.

Fully agree, which is also why I choose EU/Swiss made services by default

I tried to say that, but you were better at explaining, so thank you. Without a court case, you will essentially never know, if they are truly GDPR compliant

All services you see above are provided to EU citizens, which is why they also have to abide by GDPR. GDPR does not disallow the gathering of information. Google, for example, is GDPR compliant, yet they are number 1 on that list. That’s why I would like to know if European companies still try to have a business case with personal data or not.

And what about goddamn Mistral?

Yeah, I see your point. No use to repeat the same you can read in other comments or in those 274772 guides online. I was trying to imply to just generally harden ssh because then brute-force attempts should be no issue, unless you log everything and the disk space gets maxed out :D

Fml… yes, I meant CrowdSec. Thanks for the hint

• harden sshd
• use fail2ban or even better CrowdStrike CrowdSec
• use a tool like the following to have a next-gen security solution: https://github.com/mrash/fwknop

Military governed regimes also are not elected officials. If you take office and shoot anyone else who does not want to accept it, you are literally the “leader”.

Additionally, if there are no elections, for whatever reason, there is no one new to be elected.

So keep on saying “it is against the Constitution”. Say it and watch the world around you burn.

“None of this is in any way normal,” Matthew Green.

Exactly, Matthew. But they are normal in a fascist country. Remember, if you do not fight actively against it, you are part of it. Too many former Nazis came up with the excuse “But I was forced to” or “I didn’t know any of this”. Non of those arguments are valid. Fight against it. Leave the country. But giving interviews will not change it.

Worms.

What’s up, buddy? Why the sudden silence? Or did you finally realize that “Signal security failure” was never something someone said and it was actually just something the author came up with?

If it is your first Souls-like game, then yes. Otherwise no.

That’s right. It is just unnecessary to mention Signal at all in this case, as it might cause confusion.

All good. It’s just an unnecessary punch against Signal. Especially journalist rely heavily on it, so I don’t know what the intention was with this title.

And where exactly do you see “Signal security failure” in the quoted text?

Sure sure. Oh. About the quotes. Do you mind sharing a screenshot of the quotes you are talking about?

Tell me you are dense, without telling me you are dense. You can’t make this shit up 🤣

There are no quotes. So it is not something Trump said. It was interpreted by the author of the news story.