deleted by creator

Yeah, sort of. Basically the guy that is bringing the action has to show that the entity being sued is causing irreparable harm in order to get the judge to say “stop doing that until we can have a trial”.

But on appeal, the roles are reversed. The other entity had to show that the lower court prohibiting him from doing the thing he was doing is causing him irreparable harm.

It’s quite possible for both parties to be able show that this is the case. It’s not (always, necessarily) a partisan issue.

(Disclaimer: IANAL, and all I know about American federal law is from following the news)

Maybe I’m just getting old, but it gets harder and harder to tell.

It’s always projection

All cops are bolsheviks, didn’t you hear ;)

I want to talk about Picard’s TNG S1 body suit!

The oldest millennials are from 1980. About half of them remember the fall of the Berlin Wall.

Millennials are fucking old, you idiots.

It’s obviously intended to prevent employees from planning future actions.

Personal email? I haven’t gotten a personal message over email in almost a decade.