How are Wikipedia articles like this protected against defacement and misinformation?
Anything and everything Amateur Radio and beyond. Heavily into Open Source and SDR, working on a multi band monitor and transmitter.
#geek #nerd #hamradio VK6FLAB #podcaster #australia #ITProfessional #voiceover #opentowork
How are Wikipedia articles like this protected against defacement and misinformation?
If you don’t have any hair, it won’t change colour…
(It’s a joke, laugh)
Also, not for nothing, the human body changes daily. I’d recommend that you get used to it before you have an unhappy life pursuing battle against the inevitable.
Not sure how I feel about such a bot. I can see potential security issues arising in relation to stored relationships between users and posts.
I’m fairly sure that the price information shown on a Google Search result page is advertising that comes from a different source than the results do.
As far as I know, you could write a plugin for SearXNG to query suppliers and format the output as required.
I think that Google Shopping might be queried in the same way, but I’ve never looked into it deeply.
No, you didn’t “edit” your mistake, you completely changed the meaning of your response which makes anything after it look absurd.
You originally stated that an algorithm was intelligence, the implication being that using your logic, you thought that a calculator was intelligent.
As far as the meaning of AI, you clearly don’t understand the landscape surrounding the hyperbolic assertions made by ignorant journalism about the topic.
Machine learning is one aspect of the landscape, useful as it is, intelligence it is not.
LLM emissions on the other hand appear to emulate enough grammatically correct language to fool many people some of the time, leading to their mistaken belief that what is happening is intelligence rather than, at least from their perspective, magic.
(Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. – Arthur C. Clarke)
So, intelligence it is not, Assumed Intelligence is what it is, or autocorrect gone uppity if you prefer, an algorithm either way.
There is nothing new about this phenomenon.
For example, I grew up in the beginning of the home computer boom in the 1980’s. Much of that history has completely disappeared because it was thought to be safely stored on audio cassettes and floppy discs.
Because we learnt nothing from that, the next popular storage medium, CD, lost much of the 1990’s because as it turns out, they too are not indistructible.
In case you think that this is limited to home computers, today we couldn’t build, let alone launch a Saturn V rocket and send it to the moon, even though we know that this happened many times. Why? Because we don’t have the tapes and those that we do, can’t be read by any equipment we have, not to mention undocumented skills, knowledge, experience and processes.
History has always been written by the survivors.
So … write it down and survive!
Ignorance is bliss…
A.I. means Assumed Intelligence, despite what you might have read elsewhere. Using it to do “research” is how you’re going to get first hand experience with so-called “hallucinations”.
But you do you…
As opposed to Arabic speakers in the other party?
I’m an industry professional in ICT with 40 years experience.
I’ve come to form the view that industry certification is a vendor lock-in process created solely for the purpose of generating a guaranteed income stream for that vendor.
If your employer wants to spend its money on certification, by all means go for it as a learning experience.
If you have to pay for it yourself, I’ve yet to see any evidence that they represent a return on investment of any kind in your career.
That’s not to say that learning should be abandoned, quite the opposite. In this industry, if you’re not learning, you’re going backwards.
Stay curious, read verociosly and try to figure out how stuff works and more importantly, how it breaks.
Mathematics and Politics.
There are many more people who are “working class” than rich. The argument is that if you take some money from a lot of people, you get more money than if you take a lot of money from some people.
There’s also the argument that if everyone pitches in, the overall burden for each individual is less.
What this fails to address is that the richer you are, the more you can play with your money and end up with nothing to tax. This is why the rich get richer and the rest of us don’t.
Running through all that is a thing called “trickle down economics” which claims that the money from the rich ends up in society, but recent reviews of this have proven this to be nonsense. Politicians use this as an argument for the status quo.
Finally, the rich shape the narrative. Politicians are essentially elected by the rich through their manipulation of the story through their media empires and social media platforms.
Yeah, good luck with that. The Facebook bots are so bad, they literally hammer sites into the ground, to the point where they’re actively being blocked.
Where is this “community” you speak of?
The word you’re looking for is “curmudgeon”.
What I was actually trying to do is encourage a discourse that furthered society, rather than rehash a trope such as the one found at the source of this thread.
I’m not confident that this will actually eventuate here, but I’m hopeful that someone will pleasantly surprise me.
So, if the author is prominently featured on the cover of a book, how hard is it to not pickup or buy a book by an author you don’t care for?
I mean, you have to at least be able to read before there’s any point in buying a book, unless you need toilet paper in a compact portable form and then the author really doesn’t matter…
Anyone?
I was recently introduced to a Microsoft focused Managed Service Provider who told me to my face that they absolutely adopted it in their business to “help run it”.
After that I stopped listening to anything they had to say.
Microsoft has very deep tentacles all over the Australian Government, even more after they donated some money for a random new initiative which does nothing for society and in my opinion absolutely benefits the Microsoft bottom line.
We’ve had “Cash for Comments”, this is “Government Bought and Paid For”…
I did originally write that in my post, but deleted it because I asked myself, “What’s the alternative?”
That looks like a massive bear claw about to strike!
And so the world of WordPress comes to an inglorious ending …
That was very helpful and interesting. Thank you for taking the time to explain.