![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f6cb1e0f-35a7-4ac2-97f2-ea6baeb1e960.png)
This fascination with machines went back that far huh. What a bizarre world. After getting out of the machines thing, you realize how utterly messed up it is.
Good post.
This fascination with machines went back that far huh. What a bizarre world. After getting out of the machines thing, you realize how utterly messed up it is.
Good post.
There have already been several shootings by people trying to trigger a “race war”.
You can see that bloodshed is on their mind. They will stop at nothing.
Never underestimate how uninformed people are.
No idea? It comes down to the one person doing the job that may or may not care.
You ever try to take down a greased up deaf guy?
The case is in US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, so appeals would be heard in the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit—which is generally regarded as one of the most conservative appeals courts in the country.
In April, the FTC issued a rule that would render the vast majority of current noncompete clauses unenforceable and ban future ones. The agency said that noncompete clauses are “an unfair method of competition and therefore a violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act,”
…
“The issue presented is whether the FTC’s ability to promulgate rules concerning unfair methods of competition include the authority to create substantive rules regarding unfair methods of competition,” Brown, a Trump appointee, wrote.
Brown acknowledged that “the FTC has some authority to promulgate rules to preclude unfair methods of competition.” But “the text, structure, and history of the FTC Act reveal that the FTC lacks substantive rulemaking authority with respect to unfair methods of competition under Section 6(g),” she wrote.
Uh so what are older (I’m assuming before digital) videos shot on if not film?
*Wait do you mean like old tv shows? I think some of those were shot on tape.
Now fortified with immunity! A part of a complete breakfast autocracy.
Yup this is the way to do it too. It needs to be part of the Constitution to override this “interpretation”.
Yup. But let’s keep growing the world population while we’re at it.
Never underestimate how uninformed people are.
To actually understand you’d have to have been following politics pre 9/11, which would make you probably 16 at the time. That means 39 right now. That’s a lot of adults you’re ruling out.
If you want to say understand society pre and post 9/11, then you’re probably talking 12 at the time, so 35 right now. Still a lot of adults you’re ruling out.
Huh don’t recall this. Was it a big deal at the time?
Also from Amazon description:
Courts: The authors have insider knowledge of how Obama will pack the Supreme Court and lower courts with activist judges who will overstep their constitutional authority.
Lol.
iTs a rEpUbLiC nOt a dEmoCraCy.
There’s a reason why they keep saying that recently, they don’t want democracy. They want to backflip themselves into selecting how leaders are chosen and who gets to choose.
Previous discussions have informed me that at a certain point of wealth, you no longer consider yourself part of the “black class” and you instead consider yourself part of the “wealthy class”.
In other news, everything GOP presidents do is official and everything DEM presidents do is private.
You really didn’t, you went to other cases. And not just the supreme Court bit, all the way down on this case (overturning election case).
But I see you’re not going to admit it.
Different machine.