Looks more like a disquieting Willy Wonka.

Then I’d imagine you wouldn’t be a neighborhood prostitute and run an onlyfans.

Although I shouldn’t presume.

I could crush a biscuit with butter and jam. A nice, unsalted butter. Maybe even sweet butter if you can swing it.

Ooh, that’s something I didn’t grok when I first saw these articles pop up. Everything is focused on the “no sex punishment” angle. But, for women, now sex is more of a Russian roulette with varying amounts of bullets based on luck and how much the man cares about contraception.

An accident could saddle them with an unwanted child. Or death outside a hospital because doctors are immobilized by “abortion bans”.

And then immediately die. Gotta brainwash them early that phone bad.

The only time something from Trump was more than you bargained for is when it’s either bills or consequences.

Pretty sure they were used in self-defense in a more dangerous era. Might be an urban legend though, I never verified.

Yeah, more confirmation that being a shithead isn’t cultural. It’s an individuals problem that is unfortunately ubiquitous.

I thought he was always on Fox. Which is merely a very stupid, malicious child pretending to be a news channel.

How hard it is to meet with Muslium or Arab or Palestinian, snd say something to make them trust her?

I don’ t get this. Why promise something you are sure you can’t commit to? Why desire for a politician to lie to you?? Politicians are already dragged for false promises on things they’ve actually tried (but failed) to accomplish. But you want them to whisper sweet nothings in your ear about an incredibly politically-complex issue…for what? I don’t want her to say it unless she means to do it.

I don’t get what this statement is getting at in relation to the above post?

The assumption that every person looking for a quirky domain was conscious of and complicit in the fraught relationship of the claimaint countries is absolutely untenable.

Title feels like clickbait. Would be more convinced it was deliberate clickbait if the thumbnail didn’t directly show the sign saying “negro” and not the actual slur.

But that just makes the choice of title more confusing.

Perhaps you could say that if you arbitrarily remove any nuance or qualifications at all from the statement.

A reasonable person would see a message advising women to hide who they vote for from their signficant others and question why they (Harris’s advisors) thought the message would land. And what that says about the people those women are married to.

Made significantly more difficult because the American president is the one doing the asking.

No need for (a). That’s barely a cover and certainly not part of his racist mathematics.

Talibangelical cats. Like Rumtumtugger, Mr. Mistoffelees, and the Nefarious Netanyahu.

If my tail wouldn’t be prehensile, then I’d want it remove too. It’s a sartorial mess with no upside.

I imagine the difference is a between “why” and “why not”.

A generally educated couple might encounter the question of “Is there I reason why I should have kids?”, decide “yes, because I’d like to”, and have 1-3 kids. More poorly educated couples encounter the question “is there a reason why I should not have kids?”, decide “no”, and have 2-3 more.

“Maudlin” is a word that comes to mind.