Doesn’t Google drive do this?

It’s a common convention for chapters to start on the right page, check a physical book

Allegedly, Tusk’s response to his protégé losing presidential election to a far-right gangster is making a universally disliked far-right lawyer his Secretary of Justice to replace a mediocre minister, but popular human rights activist. So even worse

I got what I deserve? And what is that? Nothing will change and nothing would change if the other guy won. It’s a stalemate

If all you know about the two parties who have been ruling Poland for the past 20 years is that one of them doesn’t “beat the gays” then I don’t think you should be judging our individual voting strategies.

If my choice is right wing (which will empower the right wing government I don’t support) or far right (which will fight the right wing government I don’t support) then the choice is nonexistent

See my edit

Quite the opposite. See my comment above

I want public healthcare — which neither candidates supports. Trzaskowskis party literally proposed to reduce the healthcare budget by 20bln like a month ago

I want marriage equality — which neither candidate supports. Trzaskowski is said to be in favour but he never said it straigh up and he vocally opposes same-sex adoption.

I want affordable housing — which neither candidate supports. Both parties similarly had their housing programmes which caused the market prices to soar and opposed public housing.

I want ecology — both candidates oppose nuclear power and Trzaskowskis party literally cut public forestry budget and increased the deforestation rate

I want the church to shut up and stop stealing public money — Trzaskowskis party, despite being called “anticlerical” gave the 20% increase of the Church Budget in 2025. Their original promise was to reduce it to 0.

I want a reasonable migration policy — both candidates’ parties use migrants as scapegoats and support limiting asylum laws.

I want access to abortion — which Nawrocki opposes; Trzaskowski himself supports it, but some of his party and majority of his coalition doesn’t and will never vote for it

Both candidates are shit in their own way

I want public healthcare — which neither candidates supports. Trzaskowskis party literally proposed to reduce the healthcare budget by 20bln like a month ago

I want marriage equality — which neither candidate supports. Trzaskowski is said to be in favour but he never said it straigh up and he vocally opposes same-sex adoption.

I want affordable housing — which neither candidate supports. Both parties similarly had their housing programmes which caused the market prices to soar and opposed public housing.

I want ecology — both candidates oppose nuclear power and Trzaskowskis party literally cut public forestry budget and increased the deforestation rate

I want the church to shut up and stop stealing public money — Trzaskowskis party, despite being called “anticlerical” gave the 20% increase of the Church Budget in 2025. Their original promise was to reduce it to 0.

I want a reasonable migration policy — both candidates’ parties use migrants as scapegoats and support limiting asylum laws.

I want access to abortion — which Nawrocki opposes; Trzaskowski himself supports it, but some of his party and majority of his coalition doesn’t and will never vote for it

Both candidates are shit in their own way

I myself abstained this time (just voted both). Voting for Nawrocki would be against Poland and voting for Trzaskowski would be against my personal interest as an individual. There wasn’t lesser evil this time and nothing would change regardless.

Edit: I want public healthcare — which neither candidates supports. Trzaskowskis party literally proposed to reduce the healthcare budget by 20bln like a month ago

I want marriage equality — which neither candidate supports. Trzaskowski is said to be in favour but he never said it straigh up and he vocally opposes same-sex adoption.

I want affordable housing — which neither candidate supports. Both parties similarly had their housing programmes which caused the market prices to soar and opposed public housing.

I want ecology — both candidates oppose nuclear power and Trzaskowskis party literally cut public forestry budget and increased the deforestation rate

I want the church to shut up and stop stealing public money — Trzaskowskis party, despite being called “anticlerical” gave the 20% increase of the Church Budget in 2025. Their original promise was to reduce it to 0.

I want a reasonable migration policy — both candidates’ parties use migrants as scapegoats and support limiting asylum laws.

I want access to abortion — which Nawrocki opposes; Trzaskowski himself supports it, but some of his party and majority of his coalition doesn’t and will never vote for it

Both candidates are shit in their own way

Check out Windows Ameliorated

my understanding is the that green line represents the linear relation of salary to knowledge which OP would consider fair and just. therefore the part where red line is above the green one means people who earn below average are overpaid for their knowledge and professional contribution. and similarly, the part where the red line is below the green one means people who earn above average are underpaid

Than

They also told the kid that Santa is basically a fun game people play. It’s not literally true but don’t spoil it for other kids.

If anyone thinks they are special, cause they were the kid who knew Santa wasn’t real at the young age, then I’m sorry to break it to you but all kids know that, they just play along to get gifts

Poland: Blik.

Some would probably also say Paczkomaty and Żabka, but neither automatic parcel lockers nor breaking labour laws are strictly Polish inventions, so I wouldn’t count them

This won’t answer your question directly, but I know in some jurisdictions gift cards or prepaid lunch cards are taxed differently than income and that’s why employers often resort to these instead of actual salary raises

Maria Skłodowska-Curie <angry Polish noises>

jk btw

atomic elements, there are 19 named after 20 people.

What do you mean? There’s one named after two persons?

I do